Original cases
Search every case
Full-text search of the original case documents — the actual words, not the briefs.
- 1
Jeremy Mark Block v Kenya Forest Service; Chief Land Registrar & 3 others (Interested Parties) [2019] KEELC 2175 (KLR)
ELCOriginal[2019] KEELC 2175 (KLR)2019-07-24…On the 4th June 2015, the court directed that the application be canvassed by way of written submissions. The petitioner…
- 2
Block v Kenya Forest Service; Chief Land Registrar & 3 others (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Petition 1396 of 2014) [2024] KEELC 1202 (KLR)
ELCBrief[2024] KEELC 1202 (KLR)2024-02-29Reversed below…in his ofice who testified before the Court. He made reference to a Deed Plan No. 67617 dated 10th March…
- 3
Mining R US Ltd v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Mining, Blue Economy and Maritime Affairs & another
ELCOriginal[2025] KEELC 18740 (KLR)2025-07-08…In BOM Uhuru Secondary School -vs- City County Director of Education & Others [2015] eKLR, the court pronounced on the threshold…
- 4
Khimji Bhimji Seyani & 2 others v Attorney General [2015] KEELC 716 (KLR)
ELCBrief[2015] KEELC 716 (KLR)2015-03-13…at court rates to the plaintiffs. Judgment dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this…13th…….day of…March….2015. J…
- 5
Khamis & another v Mwarome (Sued as the Administrator of the Estate of Masha Dena Kideswe) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 41 of 2015) [2025] KEELC 4727 (KLR)
ELCOriginal[2025] KEELC 4727 (KLR)2025-06-17Set aside in part…The defendant petitioned the High Court at Malindi in Succession Cause Number 21 Of 2003 for a grant of letters…
- 6
Mwarome v Khamis & 3 others (Land Case Petition E023 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 2339 (KLR)
ELCBrief[2026] KEELC 2339 (KLR)2026-04-23Appeal struck out…The defendant petitioned the High Court at Malindi in Succession Cause Number 21 Of 2003 for a grant of letters…
- 7
Muiruri v Mwilu & another (Civil Case E046 of 2022) [2025] KEMC 59 (KLR)
MagistrateBrief[2025] KEMC 59 (KLR)2025-03-24…In the authority of S J v Francesco Di Nello & another [2015] KECA 606 (KLR), the Court of Appeal observed…