Five Star Agencies Ltd & another v National Land Commission & 2 others (Civil Appeal E290 & 328 of 2023 (Consolidated)) [2024] KECA 439 (KLR)
The bottom line
#You cannot seize money from a Kenyan State organ like the NLC; you must follow the Government Proceedings Act route and obtain a Certificate of Order first.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether garnishee proceedings lie against the NLC as a State organ
No. The NLC is a State organ and part of government; Order 23 garnishee proceedings do not apply, and the section 21 Government Proceedings Act procedure (certificate of order against the government plus mandamus) is the exclusive mode of execution.
The court read Order 23 rule 1 together with Order 29 Rule 2(c) of the Civil Procedure Rules, which bars attachment of debts orders against the Government. Section 21(4) of the Government Proceedings Act prohibits execution against the Government. The rationale, drawn from Kisya Investments Ltd, is parliamentary control over public expenditure. The NLC's governmental character was uncontested. Five Star's right to prompt compensation under Article 40(3)(b)(i) is affirmed, but the remedy lies through the statutory procedure, not garnishee.
Validity of the earlier mandamus order of 13th December 2018
The mandamus order was issued without the condition precedent being met, as Five Star never obtained a Certificate of Order against the Government as required by section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act.
Before issuing mandamus compelling satisfaction of a decree against the Government, the court must satisfy itself that the section 21 procedure was followed: a certificate of order (and costs) against the Government issued after 21 days and served on the relevant entity, followed by a demand for payment. Five Star served only the decree, not the certificate. The trial court did not verify compliance with this condition precedent, so the mandamus ought not to have issued.
Whether KENHA was a necessary party and whether the 2014 judgment should be set aside ex debito justitiae
KENHA was not a necessary party. Five Star sought no relief against it, its statutory role is limited, and it made no inquiry-stage reservations and did not deposit compensation funds as required by section 111(1A) of the Land Act.
Applying Order 1 rule 10(2) and the necessary/proper party distinction in Kingori v Chege and Deported Asians Custodian Board v Jaffer Brothers, the court examined each party's statutory role under the Kenya Roads Act and the Land Act. The NLC alone conducts acquisition, valuation and payment. KENHA's awareness of the decree since 2017 and six-year delay in applying further weighed against setting aside. Its Article 50 fair-hearing claim therefore had no basis.
Whether KENHA had locus standi to file the applications of 21st and 28th February 2023
KENHA had no necessary locus standi; its applications were competent only in form (as to the 28th February application) but failed on the merits since joinder was unnecessary.
Having found KENHA was not a necessary party and that its role in the acquisition was limited by sections 107, 111(1A) and 113 of the Land Act, the court concluded that the acquiring entity lacked standing to intervene to protect funds in the NLC's special compensation account. The dispute was primarily between the NLC, the entity mandated to acquire land, and Five Star, whose land was acquired on KENHA's behalf.
Legal principles established
#- Execution against the Government and State organs, including garnishee proceedings under Order 23, is barred; decrees against the Government may only be enforced through the procedure in section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act, culminating in an order of mandamus.
- A Certificate of Order against the Government under section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act is a mandatory condition precedent to an order of mandamus compelling the Government to settle a decree.
- The acquiring authority's role in compulsory acquisition is limited to notifying the NLC, depositing compensation funds under section 111(1A) of the Land Act, and participation in the inquiry; it is not a necessary party to a PAP's challenge to compensation.
Court orders
#- 1.The consolidated appeals by Five Star Agencies Limited and KENHA are dismissed
- 2.Each party to bear its own costs
- On appeal from
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- ELC Suit No. 445 of 2014
- Jurisdiction invoked
- First appellate jurisdiction over appeals from the Environment and Land Court (Environment and Land Court Act)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (21)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Ngoje v Chief Executive Officer, National Irrigation Authority & another (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 3877 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 3877 (KLR)18 Jun 2026
- Dembena International Limited v National Land Commission & another (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E058 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3671 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 3671 (KLR)11 Jun 2026
- Kishau & 2 others (Suing as officials and on behalf of Ewangan Tourism Cultural Centre) v National Land Commission (Environment and Land Case E003 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 3384 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 3384 (KLR)4 Jun 2026
- National Land Commission v Wambugu (Miscellaneous Civil Application 2B of 2024) [2026] KEELC 3024 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 3024 (KLR)14 May 2026
- Lakeview Panorama Ltd v Kenya Electricity Transmission Company Limited (KETRACO) (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E002 of 2026) (Environment and Land) [2026] KEELC 2680 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 2680 (KLR)7 May 2026
- Kisangi v Member of County Assembly Mlolongo Syokimau Ward & another; National Land Commission (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Petition 11 of 2020) [2026] KEELC 1008 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 1008 (KLR)24 Feb 2026applied
- Watamu Men Fridays Limited v Attorney General & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E104 of 2019) [2026] KEELC 895 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 895 (KLR)17 Feb 2026
- Milly Glass Works Limited v Kenya Railways Corporation & another[2025] KESC 72 (KLR)5 Dec 2025
- Kitur v National Land Commission & another (Environment and Land Case 4 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 7297 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 7297 (KLR)23 Oct 2025
- Kitur v National Land Commission & another (Environment and Land Case 4 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 7297 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 7297 (KLR)23 Oct 2025
- Njeri (Suing as the Legal Personal Representative of the Estate of Njeri Ngugi) v County Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Trans Nzoia & 2 others; Chemnjor (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Petition E001 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 5126 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 5126 (KLR)9 Jul 2025applied
- Republic v National Land Commission; Five Star Agencies Limited (Exparte Applicant) (Environment & Land Case 445 of 2014) [2025] KEELC 4313 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 4313 (KLR)9 Jun 2025applied
- Republic v County Secretary, County Government of Meru & 3 others; Kaburu t/a Mwirigi Kaburu & Co Advocates (Exparte Applicant) (Environment & Land Case E014 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 4161 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 4161 (KLR)19 May 2025
- Milly Glass Works Limited v Kenya Railways Corporation & another[2025] KESC 26 (KLR)16 May 2025
- Nkaduda v County Assembly of Tana River & 4 others (Petition 6 of 2021) [2025] KEELRC 1244 (KLR)[2025] KEELRC 1244 (KLR)5 May 2025applied
- Ojwang v National Irrigation Authority & another (Environment & Land Case E010 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 217 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 217 (KLR)24 Jan 2025applied
- Munje v County Assembly of Tana River & 2 others; Majimbo & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E005 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2721 (KLR)[2024] KEELRC 2721 (KLR)7 Nov 2024
- Kenya Railways Corporation & another v Milly Glass Works Limited (Civil Appeal E083 of 2022 & E035 of 2023 (Consolidated)) [2024] KECA 1482 (KLR)[2024] KECA 1482 (KLR)25 Oct 2024
- Republic v National Land Commission; Mohammed (Suing on Behalf of Bilal Primary School Narok) (Exparte Applicant) (Environment & Land Case 250 of 2018) [2024] KEELC 6711 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 6711 (KLR)14 Oct 2024applied
- Republic v The National Land Commission; M’inoti (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review Application E007 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 6355 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 6355 (KLR)25 Sept 2024applied
- County Government of Marsabit & another v Lochich (Miscellaneous Application E005 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 5734 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 5734 (KLR)31 Jul 2024applied
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Five Star Agencies Ltd & another v National Land Commission & 2 others (Civil Appeal E290 & 328 of 2023 (Consolidated)) [2024] KECA 439 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Civil Appeal No. E290 of 2023 (consolidated with Civil Appeal No. E328 of 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/439/eng@2024-04-12
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.