National Land Commission v Wambugu (Miscellaneous Civil Application 2B of 2024) [2026] KEELC 3024 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Land Court dismissed the National Land Commission's attempt to overturn a Kshs.145 million land acquisition judgment because review applications must be filed in the original case.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Applicant satisfied the statutory grounds for review under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules
The Applicant did not meet any of the conditions for review: no error apparent or mistake on the face of the judgment, no new evidence, and no sufficient reason; the application was in substance an appeal in the wrong manner and forum
The court held that review is made to the court which passed the decree, and here the Applicant abandoned the original suit and filed a miscellaneous application without the actual suit file, so the court could not competently decide it. On the merits, none of the statutory grounds - discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or sufficient reason - was made out. The grounds advanced were attacks on the judgment amounting to grounds of appeal, which cannot qualify as grounds for review.
Whether the uncommissioned supporting affidavit could support the application
The affidavit, not having been signed and stamped by a qualified Commissioner of Oaths, is not an affidavit in law; it was expunged and its annexures deemed improperly produced
Relying on the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act (Cap 15), the court noted that a Commissioner of Oaths must be appointed by the Chief Justice and gazetted, and must state in the jurat the place and date the affidavit is taken. Applying Black's Law Dictionary as adopted in Muktar Bishar Sheikh v IEBC, an affidavit must be voluntary, written and commissioned; the absence of commissioning means the document is not an affidavit known in law and cannot stand as evidence.
Legal principles established
#- Review lies only to the Court which passed the decree, and that Court must have access to the actual suit file; a review application filed in a miscellaneous cause without the original file is not competent
- An uncommissioned document is not an affidavit known in law and should be expunged from the record
Court orders
#- 1.The supporting affidavit sworn on behalf of the Applicant is expunged from the record, and the documents attached to it cannot be deemed properly produced before the Court
- 2.The entire miscellaneous application is dismissed in its entirety
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Inherent review jurisdiction under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) and Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "National Land Commission v Wambugu (Miscellaneous Civil Application 2B of 2024) [2026] KEELC 3024 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Miscellaneous Application (Notice of Motion dated January 15, 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3024/eng@2026-05-14
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.