Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedEmployment and Labour Relations Court Case No. 168 of 2016 (appeal therefrom)· [2021] KECA 63 (KLR)

Board of Management Nyeri Primary School v Maina & 33 others (Civil Appeal 81 of 2017) [2021] KECA 63 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
8 October 2021
2,030 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal ruled that employees of school Boards of Management are not civil servants, so public service pay circulars do not apply to them.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a Court of Appeal first appeal from the judgment of Hon. Justice B. Ongaya of the Employment and Labour Relations Court delivered on 5th May 2017, in which Dadson Maina and 33 others, non-teaching staff of Nyeri Primary School, were awarded KShs. 9,634,098 on the basis of two circulars issued by the then Ministry of State for Public Service in 2011 and 2012. The Board of Management of Nyeri Primary School, which had not filed a defence but had raised a preliminary objection that the circulars did not apply to it as it was not a civil service employer, appealed. The Court of Appeal framed three issues: whether the Respondents were civil servants or public officers under Article 260 of the Constitution and the Public Service Commission Act; whether they were employees of the National Government; and whether the circulars applied to them. The Court held that Boards of Management are bodies corporate with statutory power to recruit, employ and remunerate non-teaching staff under Section 59(p) of the Basic Education Act and Regulation 17, and are not alternative agencies for recruitment into public service, which is the preserve of the Public Service Commission under Article 234(2)(a). The Respondents were therefore not civil servants, public officers or employees of the National Government, and the circulars had no place in their contracts of service. Only professional-cadre staff enjoy Civil Service-similar terms. The appeal was allowed in its entirety, the ELRC judgment and decree were set aside, and, as the Appellant was represented by State Counsel, no orders as to costs were made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Respondents were civil servants or public officers within the meaning of Article 260 of the Constitution

Holding

They were not. Boards of Management are not alternative agencies for recruitment into the public service; recruitment into public service is the preserve of the Public Service Commission under Article 234(2)(a).

Reasoning

The Court reasoned that Boards of Management are bodies corporate with statutory power to recruit, employ and remunerate non-teaching staff under Section 59(p) of the Basic Education Act and Regulation 17. That power is not an alternative route into public service, which is the preserve of the Public Service Commission under Article 234(2)(a) of the Constitution read with Part VI of the Public Service Commission Act. Employment by a statutory body therefore does not confer civil servant status.

p. 3
02

Whether the Respondents were employees of the National Government

Holding

They were not; they were employees of the Appellant, a body corporate.

Reasoning

The Court held that the Respondents, though employed by a statutory body, were not employees of the National Government. The Appellant, as a body corporate, had statutory power to recruit, employ, remunerate, promote, demote or terminate its employees under Section 59(p) of the Act, provided such powers are exercised in accordance with the applicable statute law governing employment in public corporations.

p. 4
03

Whether the Circulars of 27th June 2011 and 25th June 2012 applied to the Respondents

Holding

No; the circulars had no place in the contracts of service between Boards of Management and their employees.

Reasoning

Having found the Respondents were not civil servants, the Court held the circulars issued by the then Office of the Prime Minister/Ministry of State for Public Service did not apply to them. Using Black's Law Dictionary's definition of civil service, the Court found the Respondents were not employed in a State department. Further, under Regulation 18 only professional-cadre staff enjoy Civil Service-similar terms, and no evidence showed the Respondents were professionals; their terms were determined by the Board under Regulation 19.

p. 4
04

Duty of a first appellate court

Holding

A first appeal is by way of retrial; the court must re-analyse and re-assess the evidence and reach its own conclusions.

Reasoning

The Court, sitting as a first appellate court, restated the settled principle from Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co, as adopted in Arthi Highway Developers Limited v West End Butchery Limited, that a first appeal is by way of retrial: the appellate court must reconsider and evaluate the evidence and draw its own conclusions, while making due allowance for the fact that it did not see or hear the witnesses.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Employees of Boards of Management established under the Basic Education Act are not civil servants or public officers and circulars issued by the State Department for Public Service do not apply to their contracts of service
  • Employment by a statutory body does not constitute a person a civil servant or public officer
  • Only professional-cadre staff employed by Boards of Management enjoy terms similar to Civil Service counterparts; non-professionals' terms are determined by the Board

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal allowed in its entirety
  2. 2.Judgment and decree of the ELRC delivered on 5th May 2017 set aside
  3. 3.No orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 234(2)(a); Article 260
  • Public Service Commission Act, 2017Part VI
  • Basic Education Act (Sections 55, 56(1), 59, Fourth Schedule paragraphs 1 and 16(7))Sections 55, 56(1), 59(p); Paragraphs 1 and 16(7) of the Fourth Schedule
  • Basic Education Regulations, 2015Regulations 2, 17, 18, 19

Cases cited (2)

  • Arthi Highway Developers Limited v West End Butchery Limited and 6 others
  • Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co.
    [1968] EA p.123
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court
ELRC Case No. 168 of 2016 (Nyeri)
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Court of Appeal from the Employment and Labour Relations Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (4)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Board of Management Nyeri Primary School v Maina & 33 others (Civil Appeal 81 of 2017) [2021] KECA 63 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Employment and Labour Relations Court Case No. 168 of 2016 (appeal therefrom). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2021/63/eng@2021-10-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.