Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

In re Adoption of Baby AW a.k.a. CWM

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU ADOPTION CAUSE NUMBER 30 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF BABY AW a.k.a. CWA............................................INFANT AND AMW.......................1ST APPLICANT RWM....................2ND APPLICANT JUDGMENT The application is brought by way of originating summons and is dated the 19 th June, 2017. The applicants AMW and RWM through their advocate Makori & Rioba Company Advocates seek the following orders: 1. Spent. 2. Spent. 3.Spent. 4.THAT the applicants be authorized to adopt the said child and the child be henceforth called CWA. 5.THAT the child be presumed to be a Kenyan Citizen having been born by Kenya parents. 6. THAT the Registrar-General do make the appropriate entries in the Adopted children’s register in respect of the minor and further the Registrar of Births and Deaths do issue a Birth Certificate in respect thereof. 7. THAT the court does issue such other orders as may be necessary in the best interest of the child. 8. THAT the costs be in the cause. The 1st and 2nd applicants are husband and wife respectively. AMN and RWM solemnized their marriage under the African Christian Marriage & Divorce Act (Cap 151) at Ndaragwa Catholic Parish on 4th December, 2004 and were issued with a certificate of marriage serial number 223289. The applicants reside in Lanet Sub-County within Nakuru County. AWN works for gain as an education officer while RWM is a teacher at [particulars withheld] High School. The applicants have no biological child of their own but have adopted as son by the name AW. They thus desire to expand their family through adoption and to give a needy child a family. Baby AW a.k.a. CWM was presumably born on 10th December, 2015 at Kakamega General Hospital. The minor’s birth certificate serial number [xxxx] is available. Baby AW a.k.a. CWM’s biological mother HS offered her for adoption due to the fact that she conceived with KN, a first cousin, which is against the family cultural practices hence the child is considered taboo according to the Luhya Customs. KN and RMA(HS’s grandmother) vide their letters dated 11 th December, 2015 to the Kenya Children Homes Adoption Society requested to offer Baby AW a.k.a. CWM for adoption. They were assisted through the offering process and RMA gave a consent on behalf of the family. HS and her grandmother were taken through the parent offering child for adoption process and they affirmed that it was in the best interest of the

page 1 of 2

child to offer her for adoption by signing Certificate of acknowledgement dated 11 th December, 2015. On the same day the child was handed over to the custody of Springs of Life Home as a child in need of care and protection. On 2nd March, 2016 Baby AW a.k.a. CWM was officially committed to the care and custody of Springs of Life Children’s Home vide Protection and Care Case Number 68 of 2016 by the Kakamega Children’s Court. On 29th January, 2016 HS and RMA swore and signed a final consent for parent offering a child for adoption. The medical information available indicates that Baby AW a.k.a. CWM growth and development is normal and is HIV negative. The home has also ensured that the child has received all the immunizations as per the Kenya Expanded Programme on Immunizations Guidelines. The applicants approached the Kenya Children’s Home Adoption Society on 5 th November, 2013 with an intention of being placed with a female child with a view to eventually adopting. They were taken through the adoption process and its implications to which they consented and filled the application forms on 3rd February, 2014. A home study was conducted by the society’s personnel at their Lanet residence in Nakuru on 14 th April, 2014. They were thereafter approved to be suitable potential adoptive parents by the society’s case committee sitting of 16 th July, 2014. Baby AW a.k.a. CWM was declared free for adoption by the Kenya children’s Home Adoption Society’s case committee sitting of 14 th December, 2016 and freeing certificate serial number 1312 issued. The applicants were placed with Baby AW a.k.a. CWM on the 3rd February, 2017 after a successful bonding. On 28th May, 2018 ZWM and JMM of Post Office Box Number [xxxx], NAKURU was appointed as Guardian ad Litem of the minor herein and the Director of Children's Services in the Ministry of Labour & Social Protection was directed to investigate the applicants' fitness to adopt and file a report. The minor was presumed a Kenyan citizen. Salome Waithaka, a personnel from the children's department interviewed the Applicants on the 13th December, 2018 and made a home visit to the applicants' residence on the 26th November, 2018 for further investigations. Mr. Mwambi Mongare, the County Children's Coordinator filed a favourable report in Court dated 4th April, 2019 on the Applicant's suitability to adopt baby AW a.k.a CWM. Upon reading the above report and satisfying myself that all the legal requirements have been adhered to, this Court is satisfied that the applicants are suitable persons to adopt Baby AW a.k.a CWM and that they are also financially stable and have the means to provide and care for her. For the above reasons, the Court hereby orders as follows: 1. THAT the applicants be and are hereby authorized to adopt baby AW a.k.a CWM and the child be henceforth called CWA. 2.THAT baby AW a.k.a CWM be and is hereby presumed to be a Kenyan Citizen having been born by Kenyan parents. 3. THAT the Registrar-General do make the appropriate entries in the Adopted children’s register in respect of the baby AW a.k.a CWM and further the Registrar of Births and Deaths do issue a Birth Certificate in respect thereof. 4. THAT costs be in the cause. Dated and Signed at Nakuru this 9th day of July, 2019. A. K. NDUNG'U JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.