Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Peter Okoth Gumo and 14 others v Jokodhul Group & 2 others [2021] KEELC 33 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT HOM BAY ELC OS CASE NO 31 OF 2021 PETER OKOTH GUMO AND 14 OTHERS .........................PLAINTIFFS/APPLICANTS VERSUS JOKODHUL GROUP ALIAS JOKODHUL RANCHING GROUP ......1ST RESPONDENT JOKAETE GROUP ALIAS JOKAETE RANCHING GROUP..............2ND RESPONDENT JULIUS OUMA JWAN ...............................................................................3 RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. By a Notice of Motion dated 1 st December 2021 and duly filed herein on 2 nd December 2021, the applicants, Peter Okoth Gumo and 14 others through M/s S.O Odingo and company Advocates are seeking stay of execution of this court’s ruling rendered on 27 th October 2021, among other orders. 2. By the said ruling, the applicant’s originating summons Ex-parte dated 14/12/2020 and filed in court and on 15 th December 2020 together with Notice of Motion of even date, were dismissed with costs to the Respondents. 3. The Notice of Motion as pointed out at Paragraph 1 herein above is for inter-partes hearing today. The applicants’ counsel who is aware of the same, is absent without any reason or at all. 4. Mr. G.S Okoth, learned Counsel for the respondents has informed the Court that the applicants’ counsel who is aware of this date, filed no notice of change or appointment of advocate as prescribed. Counsel has prayed that the Notice of Motion be struck out with costs to the Respondents. 5. I have duly considered this matter in its entirely. The respondent’s prayer is merited. 6. Indeed, the applicants’ Counsel filed the Notice Motion dated 1 st December 2021 without compliance with the mandatory prescribed procedure; See Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. 7. Moreover, the Notice of Motion is not in consonant with transparency and accountability principles as stipulated under Article 10 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. 8. So, the Notice of Motion is not curable under Article 159 (2) (d) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. 9. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion dated 1st December 2021 is incompetent. I proceed to strike it out with costs to the respondents. DATED AND DELIVERED AT HOMA BAY THIS 15TH DECEMBER, 2021 G.M.A ONG’ONDO JUDGE Present; a) Mr. G.S. Okoth learned counsel for the Respondent

page 1 of 2

b) 1st applicant , Present c) Okello, court assistant G.M.A ONG’ONDO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Peter Okoth Gumo and 14 others v Jokodhul Group & 2 others [2021] KEELC 33 (KLR) — Original judgment | Caselaw