Search every case

…The initials “L.A.O” in the proceedings cannot be understood to refer to Land Demarcation Officer but to Land…

…That review cannot be done by way of P.O. 10. On the substance of the P.O, he submits…

…v- Republic, [1972] EA 32). Even as we revisit the evidence, we remind ourselves of what Sir Kenneth O'Cornor…

…E.O. Onderi, the learned Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecution (SADPP) opposed all the appeals on the grounds that…

…On the 28th June, 2007, the 2nd appellant’s services were terminated through a letter signed by one D.O…

…See J.A.O v Republic [2011] eKLR. The memorandum filed by the appellant and the written submissions raise six…

…Hilda E .O. OBAGA JUDGE

…We agree with the learned Judge’s interpretation of the said phrase in the case of Republic v. Kenya Revenue…

…Nor is it explained why L K’s six-year old sister O, was not called as a witness since…

…must be corroboration of a dying declaration (R v. Eligu s/o Odel and another (1943) 10 EACA 9, Re…

…such as CHARLES O. MAITANYI vs. REPUBLIC [1986] KLR 198; PAUL ETOLE & REUBEN OMBIMA vs. REPUBLIC Criminal Appeal No. 24…

…J. and on 31st March 2016 the respondent placed an advisement in the Daily Nation worded as follows: REPUBLIC OF…

…Of particular interest is the case of Njenga V. Njenga 1991 KLR 401 where Bosire J (as he then was…

…In DOUGLAS KINYUA NJERU v REPUBLIC [2015] eKLR, this Court expressly stated that under the repealed Constitution an accused person…

…follows: I, BASILIO GITONGA of P. O. Box 1491-60200, MERU in the Republic of Kenya do hereby make oath…

…The appeal herein has been filed by the law firm of M/s B.O Akang'o & Company Advocates, who…

…for purposes of this suit instant suit is P.O Box 1933, Maua. (2) The 1st applicant is the registered…

…reading of the text by P. L. O. Lumumba and P. O. Kaluma on “Judicial Review of Administrative Actions in…

…The Honourable Court further ordered that both the Notice of Motion dated 13/2/2017 and the P.O dated…

…In Daniel Kabiru Thiong’o v Republic, Cr. App. No. 131 of 2002 this Court stated the approach as follows…