Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedAppeal from Mombasa CMELRC No. 634 of 2017

Kenga Equatorial Hotels Limited t/a Mombasa Continental Resort v Wanjiru (Appeal E023 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2321 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
31 July 2025
1,941 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court threw out most of a hotel worker's awards, confirming only unpaid salary was due because he had resigned.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal from the judgment of the magistrates' court (Mombasa CMELRC No. 634 of 2017) delivered on 29 January 2025, which had awarded the respondent notice pay, 8 months' compensation for unfair termination, and unremitted NSSF dues with costs and interest. The court reappraised the record and made its own findings. It held that the respondent's claim was premised on the CBA between KUDHEIHA and the Union of Hotelkeepers and Caterers Association, making it a trade dispute under section 2 of the Labour Relations Act, which magistrates' courts are excluded from hearing under Legal Notice No. 6024 of 2018; the trial court therefore lacked jurisdiction, the ELRC retaining original jurisdiction over such disputes. On the merits, since the respondent resigned by notice dated 19 July 2014 and never pleaded unfair termination, the awards of notice pay and compensation were made in error; unremitted NSSF dues are owed to the statutory body, not the employee. The claim for 2013/2014 leave pay, filed on 3 August 2017, was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, accrued leave being a continuing injury claimable within 12 months of cessation. Claims for acting allowance, night allowance, service charge and salary arrears for an acting night auditor position failed because there was no written appointment as required by section 10(5). Only unpaid salary for work done between June and August 2014, KSh. 75,096.15, was justified. The appeal succeeded in part; each party was ordered to bear its own costs for the appeal and the lower court proceedings.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the trial magistrates' court had jurisdiction over a claim premised on a CBA, being a trade dispute under the Labour Relations Act
  2. 2.Whether the award of notice pay and compensation for unfair termination was justified where the respondent resigned
  3. 3.Whether the claim for annual leave for 2013/2014 was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act
  4. 4.Whether unpaid salary for June to August 2014 was due
  5. 5.Whether claims for acting allowance, night allowance, service charge and salary arrears for an acting position were justified
  6. 6.Whether costs and interest in employment disputes are discretionary

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of magistrates' courts over trade disputes

Holding

The trial court lacked jurisdiction because the claim was premised on a CBA, constituting a trade dispute reserved for the ELRC's original jurisdiction.

Reasoning

Under Legal Notice No. 6024 of 2018, magistrates' courts hear only employment disputes excluding trade disputes under the Labour Relations Act. A CBA-based claim is a trade dispute under section 2 of that Act. The respondent paid agency fees to KUDHEIHA and was covered by the CBA, so his claim was a trade dispute. The trial court thus proceeded without jurisdiction, except for unpaid salary for work done.

p. 4
02

Notice pay and compensation for unfair termination where employee resigned

Holding

The award of notice pay and compensation was made in error as the respondent resigned and did not plead unfair termination.

Reasoning

The respondent pleaded resignation through notice dated 19 July 2014, effective 19 August 2014, and never pleaded unlawful or unfair termination. Notice pay and compensation under sections 35 and 49 of the Employment Act can only be assessed on a foundation of unfair termination under section 45, as held in Kenya Ports Authority v Makau Munyao. With resignation, these awards do not arise.

p. 4
03

Time-bar of annual leave claim

Holding

The claim for leave accrued in 2013/2014, filed on 3 August 2017, was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.

Reasoning

Under section 28(4) of the Act, leave accrues for only 18 months unless approved for accumulation. Accrued leave is a continuing injury claimable within 12 months of cessation, as held in The German School Society v Ohany. A claim filed three years after the leave accrued is time-barred under section 90.

p. 4
04

Unpaid salary for work done

Holding

Salary for June to August 2014, KSh. 75,096.15, was due for work done while employment subsisted, whether on suspension or not.

Reasoning

Under section 18 of the Employment Act, pay for work done is due regardless of the reason termination or resignation occurred. Even during suspension, while employment subsisted the respondent's due salary should be paid. This head of claim was justified and survives despite the trial court's lack of jurisdiction.

p. 4
05

Acting allowance and allied CBA benefits

Holding

Claims for acting allowance, night allowance, service charge and salary arrears for an acting position failed for lack of written appointment and time-bar.

Reasoning

Acting allowance accrues only with a formal appointment by the employer. The only document produced was the contract dated 2 August 2013 for the position of accounts assistant; there was no letter of appointment or review as required by section 10(5) of the Employment Act. Further, monthly accruing benefits had to be claimed within the limitation period under section 90.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A claim premised on a CBA is a trade dispute under the Labour Relations Act, outside magistrates' court jurisdiction under Legal Notice No. 6024 of 2018
  • Awards of notice pay and compensation under sections 35 and 49 of the Employment Act can only be premised on a claim for unfair termination under section 45
  • Accrued leave is a continuing injury claimable within 12 months from cessation of employment
  • Salary for work done is due notwithstanding termination, resignation or suspension
  • Costs in employment disputes are discretionary, must be justified, and do not follow the event

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Setting aside the trial court's awards of notice pay, 8 months' compensation for unfair termination, and unremitted NSSF dues
  2. 2.Upholding payment of due unpaid salaries for work done at KSh. 75,096.15
  3. 3.Each party to bear its own costs for the appeal and the lower court proceedings

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (ELRC) Mombasa
CMELRC No. 634 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal under the Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction; Legal Notice No. 6024 of 2018 conferring limited jurisdiction on magistrates' courts in employment disputes

Relief refused

#

Notice pay and 8 months' compensation for unfair termination

The respondent resigned and did not plead unfair termination; the awards were made in error

p. 4

Unremitted NSSF dues

Unremitted dues are due to the statutory body, not the employee

p. 2

Annual leave pay for 2013/2014

Claim filed on 3 August 2017 for benefits accruing in 2013/2014, time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act

p. 4

Acting allowance, night allowance, service charge and salary arrears for acting position

No formal written appointment to the acting position as required under section 10(5) of the Employment Act

p. 4

Costs

Each party shall bear its own costs for the appeal and the lower court proceedings.

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

Upon analyzing the appeal, the trial court lacked jurisdiction, except for the due unpaid salaries for work done at KSh. 75,096.15. The appeal is meritorious, and each party shall bear its costs for the appeal and the lower court proceedings.
p. 4Final orders - disposition and costs
A claim premised on a CBA is defined as a trade dispute under section 2 of the Labour Relations Act.
p. 3Jurisdiction - trade disputes
Upon the resignation, the award of notice pay and compensation does not arise. These were awarded in error.
p. 4Notice pay and compensation
accrued leave forms a claim of the nature of a continuing injury and once earned should be claimed within 12 months from the date of cessation
p. 4Limitation of leave claims
The award of costs is discretionary and must be awarded based on reasons. Costs do not follow the cause.
p. 4Costs in employment disputes

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Judgment states the respondent resigned effective 19 August 2014 in most passages but paragraph 5 states he resigned on 19 August 2017

minor

The claimed unpaid salary figure is pleaded as Ksh. 75,096.18 but awarded as Ksh. 75,096.15

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (2)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenga Equatorial Hotels Limited t/a Mombasa Continental Resort v Wanjiru (Appeal E023 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 2321 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Appeal from Mombasa CMELRC No. 634 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2025/2321/eng@2025-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.