Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 448 of 2010· [2014] KEELRC 1076 (KLR)

Union of Kenya National Research & Allied Institutes Staff of Kenya (Unrisk) v Kenya Medical Research Institute (Kemri [2014] KEELRC 1076 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
18 June 2014
1,346 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Industrial Court confirmed that even senior managers can join a union, and enforced the agreed KEMRI-UNRISK collective bargaining agreement as negotiated.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This dispute, arising from a ruling of the Industrial Court delivered on 3rd October 2013, concerned the finalisation of a Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Union of Kenya National Research and Allied Institutes Staff of Kenya (UNRISK) and the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI). The court had earlier directed the parties to negotiate for thirty days and report back on progress. After a series of mentions, the parties reported agreement on most items but remained divided on union representation for management staff in job groups MR 11 to MR 15, and on the effective date of the CBA. The union, relying on Article 41(5) of the Constitution and Sections 54(1) and 57(1) of the Labour Relations Act, submitted that staff in job groups MR 11 to MR 15 were unionisable, with only the CEO and deputies in MR 16 and 17 exempt. KEMRI countered that these employees perform managerial and supervisory functions, handle confidential information and would suffer divided loyalty if unionised. The court rejected the respondent's position, holding that the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 opened a broad highway for the enjoyment of labour rights and that the respondent's arguments were untenable and unacceptable. On the effective date, the court noted the parties had agreed on 1st July 2013 and a four-year term expiring 30th June 2017, which the court could not amend. The court adopted and enforced the agreed CBA items, authorised the union to recruit from MR 11 to MR 15, directed execution of the CBA within fourteen days, and awarded costs to the claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Unionisability of senior staff in job groups MR 11 to MR 15

Holding

The court found in favour of the claimant union, holding that senior staff in MR 11 to MR 15 are unionisable and the union may recruit them.

Reasoning

The respondent argued that employees in job groups 11 to 15 perform managerial and supervisory functions, supervise board policies, handle confidential information, and would suffer divided loyalty if unionised. The court rejected these submissions, holding that Article 41 of the Constitution guarantees every person fair labour practices and every worker the right to form, join or participate in a trade union, opening broad enjoyment of socio-economic and labour rights. The respondent's arguments were therefore untenable and unacceptable.

p. 2
02

Effective date and duration of the Collective Bargaining Agreement

Holding

The court adopted the parties' agreed effective date of 1st July, 2013 and duration of four years to 30th June, 2017.

Reasoning

The parties had negotiated and agreed that the CBA would take effect on 1st July, 2013 and run for four years to 30th June, 2017. The court held it could not amend an agreed position except in very exceptional circumstances, which were not apparent. The court therefore adopted and enforced the parties' agreement on the various items of the CBA, including leave, commuter, medical risk, hardship, heads of units allowances, general wage increase and basic salaries.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The Constitution's labour rights guarantee every worker the right to join a trade union of their choice, and senior staff cannot be excluded from union representation merely on managerial grounds.
  • A court cannot amend an agreed position between parties on a CBA except in very exceptional circumstances.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The court adopts and enforces the parties' agreement on the various CBA items (Articles 14, 27, 28, 38, 41, 45, 46 and 50)
  2. 2.The effective date of the Collective Bargaining Agreement shall be 1st July, 2013 as agreed inter partes
  3. 3.The Collective Bargaining Agreement shall be in force for four years and expire on 30th June, 2017
  4. 4.The claimant union is allowed and authorized to recruit its union membership from staff cadres and categories MR 11 to MR 15
  5. 5.The Collective Bargaining Agreement be executed by the parties within fourteen days from the date of the order
  6. 6.The costs of the application and the entire dispute to be borne by the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41 (including 41(5))
  • Labour Relations ActSection 54(1)
  • Labour Relations Act 2007Section 57(1)
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 41(5) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010; Sections 54(1) and 57(1) of the Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (2)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Union of Kenya National Research & Allied Institutes Staff of Kenya (Unrisk) v Kenya Medical Research Institute (Kemri [2014] KEELRC 1076 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Cause No. 448 of 2010. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/1076/eng@2014-06-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.