Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 288 of 2013 (consolidated with Misc. Cause No. 11 of 2013)· [2014] KEELRC 804 (KLR)

Newton K. Mkabue & 2 others v Kakamega County Government & another [2014] KEELRC 804 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
11 February 2014
3,491 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court cancelled unlawful suspensions by Kakamega County because its Public Service Board wasn't properly constituted, ordering the workers' full salaries paid.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Three claimants - Newton K. Mkabue, Mmosi Benson Otundo (Town Clerk and Administrative Officer of the defunct Municipal Council of Kakamega) and Sylvance Obondo (Town Treasurer seconded by the Public Service Commission) - brought consolidated interim applications seeking injunctions and reinstatement with full salary and benefits after being suspended by the Kakamega County Public Service Board on 11 July 2013. The claimants argued that the Board had not been properly constituted at the material time and that, under Section 138 of the County Government Act and the Transition Authority guidelines, only the Public Service Commission could discipline seconded staff during the transition period. The respondents, through the affidavit of Christabel Ashiono, maintained that the suspensions were lawful, the Board was properly constituted, and the claimants were accorded hearings and were merely suspended, not dismissed. The court framed four issues and found, first, that the respondents failed to produce evidence of the Board's proper appointment (advertisements, nomination, Hansard approval, appointment letters), referring the court instead to a website. It held the Board had not been established under Section 58 of the County Government Act. Second, during the transition period only the Public Service Commission could discipline seconded staff, so the suspension usurped the PSC's powers and was of no effect. Third, although show cause letters were issued, the applicants were denied suspension allowances contrary to the PSC Discipline Manual. The court lifted the suspensions, ordered payment of all salaries and entitlements from the date of suspension, allowed prayers 3, 4 and 5, permitted the respondents to institute lawful disciplinary processes, and awarded costs to the applicants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Kakamega County Public Service Board had been constituted at the time of the applicants' suspension

Holding

The Board had not been established as envisaged under Section 58 of the County Government Act, 2012.

Reasoning

The Act prescribes a competitive appointment process involving advertisement, nomination by the Governor, approval by the County Assembly and formal appointment letters. The respondents produced no such evidence, referring the court only to the Kenya Law website. In the absence of evidence of appointment, the court found the Board was not properly constituted at the time of suspension.

p. 5
02

Whether the respondents had authority to suspend seconded staff during the transition period

Holding

Only the Public Service Commission could discipline seconded staff pending establishment of the County Public Service Board; the suspension was of no effect.

Reasoning

Relying on Article 235 of the Constitution, the Transition to Devolved Government Act 2012 and the Transition Authority's Guidelines for Governors, the court held that during the transition the PSC continues to manage public officers until County Public Service Boards are established. A suspension effected by an unconstituted Board usurped the PSC's powers.

p. 6
03

Whether the laid down disciplinary procedure was followed before suspending the applicants

Holding

Partially; the show cause letters were issued as required but the applicants were not paid the allowances they were entitled to while on suspension.

Reasoning

The Public Service Commission of Kenya Discipline Manual, July 2008 governs suspension during the transition. The applicants were served with show cause letters as expected, but they were not paid the other allowances envisaged, contrary to the provisions on entitlements of officers on suspension.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A body purporting to exercise statutory disciplinary powers must demonstrate its proper constitution and appointment with proper evidence before the court; reference to a website is not evidence.
  • Until County Public Service Boards are established, only the Public Service Commission may discipline staff seconded to county governments during the transition period.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suspension of the applicants is lifted
  2. 2.The applicants to be paid all their salaries and entitlements since the suspension was effected
  3. 3.Orders allowed in terms of prayers 3, 4 and 5 of the applications
  4. 4.The respondents are free to institute proper discipline processes backed by law
  5. 5.Costs to the applicants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 3A, 63(c) and (e)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 rules 2, 3, 4; Order 51 rules 1, 3, 4
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 235(1)(c); Article 235; Sixth Schedule Section 15(2)(b)
  • County Government ActSections 44(2), 56(2), 58(1), 138
  • Local Government Act Cap 265 (repealed)
  • Transition to Devolved Government ActSections 4(1), 7(1), 7(1)(h)
  • Labour Relations Act
  • Public Service Commission of Kenya Discipline ManualBullet 10 (July 2008)
  • Transition Authority Guidelines for Governors on Administrative Arrangements for the Transition to Devolved Government, Second Edition (May 2013)Bullets 6.14, 6.17, 6.18
  • Guideline on Management of Public Offices Seconded to the County GovernmentArticle 2.2.1
  • Letter Ref: MLG/2314/VII (19) dated 16th January 2013 on Management of Council Affairs on dissolution of CouncilsParagraph 2.3
Jurisdiction invoked
Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction; applications under Section 3A and 63(c) and (e) of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 40 rule 2, 3, 4 and Order 51 rule 1, 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Newton K. Mkabue & 2 others v Kakamega County Government & another [2014] KEELRC 804 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Cause No. 288 of 2013 (consolidated with Misc. Cause No. 11 of 2013). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/804/eng@2014-02-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.