Kalama & another v Attorney General & 7 others (Land Case E061 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 2577 (KLR)

The bottom line

The Environment and Land Court in Malindi froze all activity on six contested Kilifi land parcels until the ownership dispute is fully heard, but refused a broader injunction.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#

This is an interlocutory ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Malindi delivered by Mwangi Njoroge J on 27 April 2026. The plaintiffs sued over land measuring about 18.9463 ha known as Kilifi/Pingilikani/151, 162, 274, 275, 507 & 573, alleging that their deceased ancestors' ancestral land was properly adjudicated in 1995 but that titles issued in 2023 following deliberate delay did not reflect the position on the ground. They plead fraud in adjudication objection proceedings undertaken in the names of deceased persons, non-owners or fictitious parties, enabling the 4th to 8th defendants to appropriate the greater portion of the land, with fresh beaconing occurring in 2025 allegedly under the supervision of a DCI officer and armed police. The court had earlier, on 21 January, dismissed the 4th and 5th defendants' preliminary objection seeking striking out of the suit, holding that Sections 29 and 30 of the Land Adjudication Act did not bar the claim and that even a first registration title may be challenged for fraud under the Land Registration Act. Applying Nguruman and the Giella v Cassman Brown principles, the court found the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case and that disposal of the property pending trial would complicate and protract the litigation. The application dated 9/6/2025 was allowed only to the extent that the status quo prevailing over the suit parcels shall remain undisturbed by any party until the final hearing and determination of the suit. No costs order appears in the judgment.

Key legal issues

#

01

Whether the plaintiffs established a prima facie case

Holding

Yes - the plaintiffs showed a right threatened with violation sufficient to satisfy the first Giella limb

Reasoning

The court adopted its earlier ruling on the preliminary objection, in which it held the suit was not barred by Sections 29 and 30 of the Land Adjudication Act because the plaintiffs allege fraud after adjudication, with beaconing as recently as 2025. Relying on Nguruman, the court found the plaintiffs had demonstrated a threatened right needing protection, satisfying the prima facie case limb.

p. 2

02

Whether preservation of the suit property is necessary pending trial

Holding

Yes - disposal of the property would complicate and protract the litigation, justifying status quo orders

Reasoning

The court reasoned that if the defendants disposed of the suit property it might be taken beyond the plaintiffs' reach and would unnecessarily complicate and protract the litigation. Preservation pending hearing was therefore warranted, though only as a status quo order rather than the full injunction sought.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#

An applicant for an interlocutory injunction must show a right which is threatened and needs protection
Even a first registration title is not immune from challenge on the ground of fraud under the Land Registration Act

Court orders

#

1.The application dated 9/6/2025 is allowed to the extent that the status quo prevailing over the parcels of land known as Kilifi/Pingilikani/151, 162, 274, 275, 507 & 573 shall remain undisturbed by any of the parties until the final hearing and determination of the present suit

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Related briefs

#

ELCAllowed2026-10-08

Esabel Wambui Kamau v Jane Wagio

A woman who openly lived on and farmed Ruiru land for nearly 40 years won ownership through adverse possession, even though the title was in someone else's name.

ELCDismissed2026-10-08

Dennis Onkundi & 2 Others (Suing on their behalf and on behalf of 200 others all known as Northview Estate Resident Association) v Charles O Arigisi & 14 Others

The Environment and Land Court dismissed Northview Estate residents' bid to stop apartment construction in Utawala, ruling their association lacked proper standing and their evidence was too weak.

ELCPartially Allowed2026-10-08

Republic of Kenya in the Matter of a Judicial Review Application by DWA Estate Limited for Orders of Temporary Interdict/Stay and Restraining Orders, Certiorari, Prohibition and Declaratory Orders

A Makueni court has temporarily blocked the National Land Commission from implementing recommendations that would have forced a landowner to surrender acreage and pay compensation.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kalama & another v Attorney General & 7 others (Land Case E061 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 2577 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the extract. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/2577/eng@2026-04-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.