Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedKitale ELC (not stated in judgment)· [2019] KEELC 4867 (KLR)

Sella Nyakoa Etenyi v Andrew Kiprop Tanui & Consefta Nasimiyu Tanui (Environment & Land Case 128 of 2013) [2019] KEELC 4867 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
29 January 2019
1,065 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court voided Land Disputes Tribunal proceedings because the Tribunal law had been repealed before the elders met — succession disputes belong in the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, widow of the late Pius Kiprop Tanui, sued the 1st defendant (a son of the deceased) and a 2nd defendant, seeking a declaration that the Kwanza Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal proceedings and ruling, adopted as judgment on 13/12/2011 in Kitale CMCC Land Case No. 51 of 2011, were null and void. The defendants did not enter appearance or file a defence, and the suit proceeded to formal proof on 15/11/2018. The plaintiff testified that the deceased had settled her on 12 acres in Plot 315 Meteitei Farm, that no succession proceedings had been taken out over the intestate estate, and that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The court held that although the defendants' want of Letters of Administration was not fatal since their claim was made on their own behalf, only the High Court has jurisdiction under Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act to determine succession disputes, and the Tribunal itself had referred the matter to succession. More decisively, the Tribunal's proceedings of 20/9/2011 took place after the Land Disputes Tribunals Act had been repealed on 30/8/2011 by the Environment and Land Court Act, so the panel no longer existed in law; ignorance of the repeal was no defence. The plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence established her claim on a balance of probabilities. The court declared the Tribunal proceedings, ruling and resulting decree null and void ab initio and set them aside, with each party bearing their own costs as members of the same family. The court observed that all family members should pursue a succession cause in the High Court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Locus standi of claimants before the Tribunal without a grant of Letters of Administration

Holding

Not fatal; the defendants claimed against the plaintiff on their own behalf, not on behalf of the deceased's estate

Reasoning

The court found that although no succession proceedings had been taken out, the defendants' claim before the Tribunal was a personal claim against the plaintiff as a co-wife, not a claim on behalf of the deceased's estate. The want of a grant therefore did not invalidate the claim on that ground alone.

p. 1
02

Jurisdiction over succession disputes

Holding

Only the High Court has jurisdiction under Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act; the Tribunal's award regarding the suit land could not stand

Reasoning

The court held that even if the Tribunal had been validly in existence, it lacked jurisdiction to distribute the deceased's land. The Tribunal itself had recognized this by referring the matter to succession, and the proper forum is a succession cause in the High Court where every family member's share can be determined.

p. 2
03

Validity of Tribunal proceedings after repeal of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act

Holding

The proceedings of 20/9/2011 were illegal because the Act had been repealed on 30/8/2011 and the Tribunal no longer existed in law

Reasoning

The Environment and Land Court Act repealed the Land Disputes Tribunals Act with effect from 30/8/2011. The Tribunal sat on 20/9/2011, after that date, so the panel of elders no longer existed in law. A later circular communicating the repeal was ineffective, and ignorance of the repeal could not cure the illegality.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Only the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine succession disputes under Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act
  • Proceedings before a Land Disputes Tribunal after the repeal of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act on 30/8/2011 were a nullity

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Kwanza Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal Proceedings and Ruling read and adopted as judgment of the court on 13/12/2011 and the decree arising therefrom in Kitale Chief Magistrate's Court Land Case No. 51 of 2011 are null and void ab initio and same are hereby set aside
  2. 2.Each party shall bear their own costs of this suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActRepealed
  • Environment and Land Court Act
  • Law of Succession ActSection 47
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction (Environment and Land Court Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sella Nyakoa Etenyi v Andrew Kiprop Tanui & Consefta Nasimiyu Tanui (Environment & Land Case 128 of 2013) [2019] KEELC 4867 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Kitale ELC (not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4867/eng@2019-01-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.