Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2020] KEELC 105 (KLR)

Anthony Kiprop (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Luka Kiprop Kiptai) v Sylvester Chemweno Sang & 2 others [2020] KEELC 105 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
2 December 2020
2,533 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Eldoret land court dismissed a son's bid to overturn a decades-old tribunal award on his father's land, because he never used the appeal routes the law provided.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By an amended plaint dated 19th December 2018, the plaintiff, son and administrator of the late Luka Kiprop Kiptai, sought a declaration that Luka Kiptai owned parcel No. Moiben/Kimnai/276, a declaration that the decision of the Chebiemit Land Dispute Tribunal was void ab initio for lack of jurisdiction, setting aside of that decision and its adoption by the Iten Resident Magistrate's Court, cancellation of the decree registered on 12th April 2012 from Iten PMCC Land Dispute Tribunal No. 14 of 2011, and costs. The plaintiff's case was that the same dispute had been concluded in Iten RMCC Civil Suit No. 2 of 1997, in which the defendant was ordered to refund the purchase price, which was paid, and that the tribunal's award was made after the Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990 was repealed by the Environment and Land Court Act with effect from 30th August 2011. The defendants, who called no evidence, submitted that the suit was incompetent: the Act prescribed appeal to the Appeals Committee under section 8(1) or judicial review, not a declaratory suit. The court framed one issue - whether the suit was properly framed. Relying on Florence Nyaboke Machani, Republic v Marakwet District Land Disputes Tribunal and its own decision in Sally Jemeli Korir, the court held that the Act did not contemplate a declaratory suit as a means of challenging an award, that adopted awards remain valid judgments and executable decrees preserved by section 23(3)(e) of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act, and that a valid judgment is enforceable until overturned on appeal. The suit was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a declaratory suit is a proper vehicle for challenging a Land Disputes Tribunal award adopted as a court judgment

Holding

It is not; the statute prescribed appeal to the Appeals Committee under section 8(1) and (9) or judicial review, and the plaintiff pursued neither, making the suit an abuse of court process

Reasoning

The court held that the Land Disputes Tribunal Act had elaborate procedures for challenging awards, namely appeal to the Provincial Appeals Committee within thirty days and, on a certified point of law, to the High Court, or judicial review where the tribunal acted in excess of jurisdiction. The Act did not contemplate a declaratory suit. The plaintiff lodged no appeal, so the award and decree remained valid and enforceable, and the suit as framed was an abuse of process.

p. 4
02

Whether the effect of the repeal of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act by the Environment and Land Court Act rendered the tribunal's decision void ab initio

Holding

No; Section 23(3)(e) of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act preserves decisions, awards and adopted judgments of the defunct tribunals as valid and executable

Reasoning

Counsel for the plaintiff argued the tribunal acted after the Act's repeal on 30th August 2011. The court relied on its earlier decision in Sally Jemeli Korir, holding that the Interpretation and General Provisions Act preserves and protects decisions and awards of defunct Land Disputes Tribunals and judgments adopted by Magistrates' Courts under the repealed Act; they remain valid judgments and their decrees valid instruments capable of execution.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a statute establishes a dispute resolution mechanism, that mechanism must be followed and exhausted; a declaratory suit is not a competent avenue for challenging a Land Disputes Tribunal award adopted as a court judgment
  • Decisions and awards of the defunct Land Disputes Tribunals, and judgments adopted by Magistrates' Courts under the repealed Land Disputes Tribunal Act, remain valid and enforceable
  • A valid judgment of a court remains enforceable until overturned by an appellate court, even where jurisdiction is questioned

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The plaintiff's suit is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990Section 3; Section 8(1); Section 8(9)
  • Environment and Land Court Act No. 19 of 2011Section 31
  • Interpretation and General Provisions ActSection 23(3)(e)

Cases cited (8)

  • Peter Mbogo Njogu v Joyce Wambui Njogu & Another
    [2005] eKLR
  • Sella Nyakoa Etenyi v Andrew Kiprop Tanui & Another
    [2019] eKLR
  • Paul Muraya Kaguri v Simon Mbaria Muchunu
    [2015] eKLR
  • Republic v Marakwet District Land Disputes Tribunal & 6 others Ex-Parte Shaban Clan & 3 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Catherine C Kittony v Jonathan Muindi Dome & 2 others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Tetu Ole Naborw v Attorney General & 4 others
    [2010] eKLR
  • Florence Nyaboke Machani v Mogere Amosi Ombui & 2 others
    Civil Appeal 184 of 2011
  • Sally Jemeli Korir & Another v William Suter & 2 others
    [2020] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under the Environment and Land Court Act (court not stated to be sitting on appeal); plaintiff sought declaratory relief under the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Anthony Kiprop (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Luka Kiprop Kiptai) v Sylvester Chemweno Sang & 2 others [2020] KEELC 105 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/105/eng@2020-12-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.