REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS SCCOMM NO. E11629 OF 2025 NANCHANG MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT GROUP KENYA…….......................................CLAIMANT VERSUS STAN INTERIOR MILLER…...…………....………. …….......RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. The claimant instituted this claim vide the statement of claim dated 27/1/2025 seeking judgment against the respondent for the sum of Kshs. 286,384/= plus costs and interests. It was on the basis that the parties entered into an agreement for payment of an accrued KPLC electricity bill relating to meter account number 114012099. That the respondent was to pay an initial deposit of Kshs. 50,000/= and thereafter clear the balance of Kshs. 286,384/= on or before 31/12/2024 but failed to. 2. The respondent opposed the claim and pleaded vide its application dated 8/8/2025 and various affidavits that the amount in question was not a debt payable to the Claimant but 1|Page JUDGMENT SCCE11629 OF 2025
page 1 of 5
an electricity bill owed to Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd (KPLC) and the same had since been cleared leaving an overpayment of Kshs. 2,964/=. 3. The claim proceeded under Section 30 of the Small Claims Act and the claimant filed submissions dated 4/3/2026 whereas the respondents were dated 25/5/2026. I have considered those submissions alongside the pleadings and documents on record. The main issue for determination is whether the claimant has proven the claim as against the respondent. 4. The standard of proof in civil matters is on a balance of probabilities. See the court of Appeal in Mumbi M'Nabea v David M.Wachira [2016] eKLR. It is also trite that he who alleges must prove as provided for in Section 107 and 108 of the Evidence Act. 5. I have considered the court record. The agreement dated 14/11/2024 expressly stated that the amount in question arose from an outstanding electricity bill accrued in relation to meter account number 114012099 which was registered in the claimant’s name. The agreement further provided that the respondent would clear the outstanding bill and provided that in default, a civil suit would be instituted. 6. I do note that the agreement did not state that the sum of Kshs. 286,384/= was to be paid to the claimant for its own benefit. From the record, the respondent produced a KPLC ebill statement showing an overpayment of Kshs. 2,964/= as at February 2025. The respondent further produced MPESA 2|Page JUDGMENT SCCE11629 OF 2025
page 2 of 5
records evidencing payments made to KPLC in February and April 2025 in respect of account number 114012099. 7. On the other hand, the claimant did not place before the Court any evidence from KPLC showing that the outstanding amount remained due or that the claimant had settled the bill on behalf of the respondent and was therefore entitled to reimbursement. 8. As already held, the Evidence Act lays the burden of proof upon the claimant to prove its claim. While the claimant proved the existence of the agreement, it did not prove that the disputed sum remains outstanding or that the amount is payable to it notwithstanding the payments made to KPLC. 9. In the circumstances, the respondent was able to establish that it discharged its obligation under the agreement by making payments directly to KPLC, the ultimate beneficiary of the outstanding electricity charges whereas the claimant failed to demonstrate any loss or liability presently recoverable from the respondent. 10. In the end, I am not convinced that the claimant proved the claim on a balance of probabilities. 11. The upshot is that the claim is found to be unmerited and the same is hereby dismissed. 12. The sum of Kshs. 100,000/= deposited into the respondent’s Advocate-Client Account pursuant to the orders of this court shall be released to the respondent forthwith. 3|Page JUDGMENT SCCE11629 OF 2025
page 3 of 5
13. The respondent is awarded costs of Kshs. 10,000/= payable within 30 days hereof, which period shall constitute the stay of execution. It is so decreed. DATED and DELIVERED via CTS at NAIROBI this 14TH Day of August 2026 HON. GLADYS. W. KIAMAH RESIDENT MAGISTRATE/ADJUDICATOR 4|Page JUDGMENT SCCE11629 OF 2025
page 4 of 5
5|Page JUDGMENT SCCE11629 OF 2025
page 5 of 5