Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Mutai (Criminal Case E1330 of 2025) [2025] KEMC 152 (KLR)

Republic v Mutai (Criminal Case E1330 of 2025) [2025] KEMC 152 (KLR) (1 July 2025) (Sentence) Neutral citation: [2025] KEMC 152 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE NAKURU LAW COURTS CRIMINAL CASE E1330 OF 2025 PA NDEGE, SPM JULY 1, 2025 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND BENARD KIPKIRUI MUTAI ..................................................................... ACCUSED SENTENCE 1. The accused person herein, Benard Kipkirui Mutai, has been convicted upon own plea of the ofience of Cutting and Removing Forest Produce Contrary to section 64(1) of the Forest Conservation and Management Act No. 34/2016 as read with Section 64 (2) of the same Act. He has admitted that on 24/06/2025 at Sururu Forest in Njoro Sub-County within Nakuru County, he was found cutting and removing 2 indigenous trees Juniperus Precera (CEDAR) valued at Kshs. 109,550/88 without the authority of the Chief Conservatoire of the forest. 2. He is a first-time ofiender as no previous records were furnished by the prosecutions. He has pleaded for forgiveness. I have looked at the relevant provisions herein and I do hereby fine the accused person herein Kshs. 100,000/= in default to serve 6 months imprisonment. 3. 14 days right of appeal explained. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU IN OPEN COURT THIS 01ST \ DAY OF JULY, 2025 ALOYCE-PETER-NDEGE SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE In the presence of; Court interpreter: Janet https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2025/152/eng@2025-07-01 1

page 1 of 2

Prosecution counsel: Smith Accused: Present https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2025/152/eng@2025-07-01 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.