Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Kilonzo (Criminal Case E013 of 2024) [2024] KEMC 143 (KLR)

Republic v Kilonzo (Criminal Case E013 of 2024) [2024] KEMC 143 (KLR) (23 January 2024) (Sentence) Neutral citation: [2024] KEMC 143 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE NAKURU LAW COURTS CRIMINAL CASE E013 OF 2024 PA NDEGE, SPM JANUARY 23, 2024 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND JULIUS KILONZO ........................................................................................ ACCUSED SENTENCE 1. The accused person herein, Julius Kilonzo, has been convicted upon own plea of the ofience of Leaving Articles Upon Public Passage Contrary to By-Law 18(1) of the Municipal Council of Nakuru (General Nuisance) By-Laws 2004 and punishable under section 24(1) of the same By-laws. He has admitted that on 17/01/2024 at about 12.00am at Mololine within Nakuru County, he left sugarcane in a wheelbarrow in a manner that caused obstruction to the members of the public. 2. He is a first-time ofiender as no previous records were furnished by the prosecutions. He has pleaded for forgiveness. I have looked at the relevant provisions herein and I do hereby feel that the provisions of Community Service Act, could be applicable herein. I do therefore call for a CSO report on the suitability of the accused to undergo community service. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU IN OPEN COURT THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 ALOYCE-PETER-NDEGE SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE In the presence of; Court interpreter: Janet Prosecution counsel: n/a Accused: Present https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2024/143/eng@2024-01-23 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.