Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Surestep Systems & Solutions Limited v Kihumba & another (Civil Suit 4521 of 2019) [2023] KEMC 86 (KLR)

Surestep Systems & Solutions Limited v Kihumba & another (Civil Suit 4521 of 2019) [2023] KEMC 86 (KLR) (22 March 2023) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 86 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE MILIMANI COMMERCIAL CHIEF MAGISTRATE'S COURTS CIVIL SUIT 4521 OF 2019 JP ADUKE, SRM MARCH 22, 2023 BETWEEN SURESTEP SYSTEMS & SOLUTIONS LIMITED .................................. PLAINTIFF AND STEPHEN KIHUMBA ...................................................................... 1ST DEFENDANT JONSU ROAD & BRIDGES COMPANY LIMITED .................... 2ND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT 1. The Plaintifi filed this suit against the defendants following a road trafic accident on 26th February 2018 at Lumumba Drive in Nairobi. In the plaint filed on 24th June 2019, the plaintifi avers he was driving motor vehicle registration number KCG 698Y when the Defendant and his servant/agent/ authorized driver of motor vehicle registration number KBT 630H negligently and carelessly drove the said motor vehicle, caused it to ram into KCG 698Y causing damage to the plaintifi’s car. 2. The Plaintifi blames the Defendants and their agents/authorized servants for causing the said accident. The Plaintifi further avers that the said accident was solely caused by the negligence of the Defendants. 3. The particulars of damage occasioned to the Plaintifi’s car are captured in para 7 of the Plaint while the particulars of alleged negligence are captured in para 9 of the Plaint. The Plaintifi prays for special damages, costs of the suit and interest at court rates. The plaintifi’s insurer claims against the Defendants under the principle of subrogation of rights. 4. Return of Service on Record shows that the defendants were served with the suit papers. The Defendants entered appearance and filed a defence. The plaintifi called four witnesses who testified on oath. Pw1 adopted his witness statement on file as his evidence in chief and Defence Counsel tested this evidence on cross-examination. The defence did not show up on the date of the hearing. There was proof of service on record confirming service with the hearing notice. Parties filed and exchanged written submissions. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2023/86/eng@2023-03-22 1

page 1 of 2

5. The issues for determination before this court are liability and quontum: 1. Liability 6. With respect to liability, I have seen a copy of the Police Abstract on file which blames the driver of motor vehicle KBT 630H for causing the road accident herein. I have also seen a copy of the copy of Motor Vehicle Copy of Records dated 23 November 2018 search records confirming the identity of the owner of the motor vehicle KBT 630H as the Family Bank Limited and John Waithanji Mwangi. I note that the alleged road trafic accident happened on 26th February 2018. I have noted that the 2nd Defendant is a company. I have not seen on file any CR12 from the Registrar of Companies confirming that the aforementioned registered owners of Motor Vehicle KBT 630H are the owners of the said 2nd Defendant. According to the laws of Kenya, registration is the conclusive proof of ownership of a motorvehicle. In the absence of congruence between the police abstract and a copy of the motor vehicle copy of records showing the registered owner as at the date of the road trafic accident herein, I find the defendants not liable. 7. For the avoidance of doubt, in the absence of any further supporting proof of ownership as at the date of the accident or therebout, I am unable to ascertain and apportion liability. In the circumstances, I find that the defendants are not liable. I have relied on section 8 of the Traffic Act, Cap 403 Laws of Kenya and the reasoning of the court in Wellington Nganga Muthiora vs Akamba Public Road Services & Another[2010] EKLR. 2. Quontum 8. Having found as above on the issue of liability, I find the suit unmerited, and dismiss the same. I make no award on costs. ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENO SENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATE JUDGEMENT SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 22ND MARCH 2023 IN THE ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 12PM. In the presence of : Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe. Counsel for the Plaintifi- …………………….………………………………………………………….. (Name, Signature, Date) For the Defence: ……………………………………………….……………………………….. (Name, Signature, Date) https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2023/86/eng@2023-03-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.