Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ndungu v Maloba (Civil Suit 7553 of 2016) [2023] KEMC 63 (KLR)

Ndungu v Maloba (Civil Suit 7553 of 2016) [2023] KEMC 63 (KLR) (14 March 2023) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 63 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE'S COURT (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL SUIT 7553 OF 2016 JP ADUKE, SRM MARCH 14, 2023 BETWEEN PATRICK SAMUEL NJOROGE NDUNGU ............................................ PLAINTIFF AND MOSES STARLIN MALOBA ................................................................. DEFENDANT JUDGMENT 1. The Plaintifi filed this suit against the defendant after he sustained injuries following a road trafic accident on 3rd November 2013 along Nairobi-Naivasha Highway at Kinoo. In the plaint on record, the plaintifi avers he was a lawful pedestrian living his best life when the Defendant either acting as servant/ agent/authorized driver of motor vehicle registration number KBE 856G negligently and carelessly drove the said motor vehicle and without due care caused it to lose control and knock down the Plaintifi who was crossing the road at a pedestrian crossway thereby causing the Plaintifi to sufier injuries. 2. The Plaintifi blames the Defendants and their agents/authorized servants for causing the said accident. The Plaintifi further avers that the said accident was solely caused by the negligence of the Defendants. 3. The particulars of injuries sustained by the Plaintifi are captured in para 4 of the Plaint while the particulars of alleged negligence are captured in para 4 of the Plaint. The Plaintifi prays for general damages for pain and sufiering, loss of earning capacity, special damages, costs of the suit and interest at court rates. 4. Return of Service on Record shows that the defendants were served with the suit papers. Neither of the defendants entered appearance. As a result, judgment in default of appearance was entered against the Defendant. The suit proceeded to formal proof hearing. PW1, the plaintifi, adopted and relied on his pleadings and statements on record as his evidence in chief. Parties filed submissions. The issue for determination before this court is one: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2023/63/eng@2023-03-14 1

page 1 of 2

1. Quontum 5. The Plaintifi prays for General Damages, loss of earning capacity, Special Damages, Costs of the Suit and any other relief. With respect to Special Damages, the Plaint prays for KES 291,241/- as captured in para 4 of the Plaint. I have seen receipts on record attesting to KES 4,000, KES 1000 and KES 12,000/-. It is settled principle that special damages must be pleaded and proved. I find that KES 17,000/- has been pleaded and proved and award the same. 6. With respect to general damages, I have considered all the submissions on record and the authorities annexed thereto. I have also considered all the exhibits on record. In particular, I have relied on the reasoning of the court in Samuel Kimani & Another vs Edward Otieno & Another [2017] eKLR where the court awarded general damages for comparable injuries. From the documents on record, the plaintifi in this instance sufiered a fracture of the right leg when the accident happened. Taking into account that no amount of damages can restore the Plaintifi to what he was prior to the said accident, the rate of infiation and cost of living, I hereby award KES 500,000/- as general damages. 7. The plaintifi has pleaded for an award for loss of earning capacity. I have relied on the reasoning of the court in John Kipkemboi & Another vs Morris Kedolo [2019]Eklr and SJ vs Fransesco Di Nello & anor[2015]EKLR where the Court of Appeal stated as follows: “ Claims under the heads of loss of future earnings and loss of earning capacity are distinctively difierent. Loss of income, which may be described as real actual loss is loss of future earnings. Loss of earning capacity may be defined as diminution in earning capacity. Loss of income or future earnings is compensated for real assessable loss which is proved by evidence. On the other hand, loss of earning capacity is compensated by an award in general damages, once proved.” The plaintifi herein, was a matatu driver prior to the accident. He has since sufiered a fracture of the leg. The medical report on record confirms this. I have also seen a letter from the Plaintifi’s employer but no proof of money earned prior to the said accident. Taking into account all the above and the nature of work the plaintifi used to do, I award KES 100,000/- as general damages on account of loss of earning capacity. 8. 9. In conclusion, I enter judgement in favour of the plaintifi as follows: 1. General damages KES 500,000/- 2. Loss of earning capacity KES 100,000/ 3. Special damages KES 17,000/- 4. Costs of the suit. 5. Interest on 1, 2 and 4 above at court rates. The Plaintifi shall have costs in this suit and interests at court rates from the date of this judgement until payment in full. JUDGEMENT SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY IN NAIROBI THIS 14TH MARCH 2023 IN THE ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 1507HRS. ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENO SENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kemc/2023/63/eng@2023-03-14 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.