Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Claimant v Respondent (School Fees Arrears)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT AT NAIROBI SCCCOM 020 OF 2021 IAVINGTON MONTESSORI KINDERGARTEN LIMITED................CI AIMANT VERSUS JACK OWINO........................................................................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT By a plaint dated 20th January 2020, the claimant seeks judgment to be entered against the Respondent for; a. Damages for breach of contract b. Kshs 470,087being the outstanding school fees arrears c. Costs of and incidental to this suit d. Interest on (a), (b) and (c) above at court rates from the date they fell due until payment in fnlh e. Such other and further relief that this honourable court may deem just and fit to grant. In brief, the claimant avers that on or about the month of January 2019, the Respondent approached it to have his son O.T.J enrolled to its school in Lavington area Nairobi. The Respondent was duly informed the terms of engagement and for which he duly filed and executed the requisite application form. contravene the plaintiff s allegations and therefore the court finds that the plaintiff has proved its case against the defendant to the required standard. Disposition The upshot is that the plaintiff has proved its case on a balance of probabilities, consequently, judgment is entered against the defendant for; a. Kshs 470,087/- plus interest at court rates from the date of filing suit. b. The plaintiff is also awarded costs of the suit and interest at court rates from the date of judgment. HON. B.J OFISI (MRS) RESIDENT MAGISTRATE Judgment read, signed and delivered virtually this .5th day of May 2021 In the presence/absence of: Plaintiffs Advocate:

page 1 of 2

Defendant’s Advocate C/A -HELIDAH

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.