kehc-2026-12984

Administrators herein on even date. Filed alongside the summons are the list of beneficiaries, the annexed Consents to the Confirmation of Grant by the Beneficiaries in the Estate of Late Michael Maru Kanyingi, a full inventory of all the assets and liabilities of the deceased as at the time of his death on 20th April, 2019 and a proposed Mode of Distribution of the said Estate of the Deceased. 3. In consideration of the said application, I have perused the record and established that this is an Intestate Succession in that the Deceased died without leaving a Will and the Petitioners then petitioned for the Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate, which was issued on 24 th June, 2025 to Three (3) Administrators namely, Susan Wanjiku Maru, Viona Wanjiku Maru and Jerioth Natalia Maru, being the Widow and Daughters of the Deceased, wherein they were granted authority to manage the Estate of the Deceased, the Late Michael Maru Kanyingi. Prior to the issuance of the Grant, the petition was then published in the Kenya Gazette on 25 th April, 2025 inviting anyone who might have an objection on the same to lodge the same in court within thirty (30) days from the date of publication. 4. It is worth noting that no objection was raised against the application for Grant of Letters of Administration by anyone and at the lapse of thirty (30) days, the Petitioners were granted the Letters of Administration 2

page 2 of 10

Intestate where they were made personal representatives of the Estate of the Deceased with the power to deal with the property/assets and liabilities of the Deceased’s Estate in the manner provided for under Section 83 of the Law of Succession Act Cap 160 of the Laws of Kenya. 5. Upon the lapse of six (6) months after the issuance of Letters of Administration, the Petitioners then filed an application (Summons) for Confirmation of Grant dated 29th January, 2026 to enable them distribute the deceased’s Estate amongst the beneficiaries. Through the joint affidavit, the Administrators have properly identified all the beneficiaries of the Deceased’s Estate and clearly set out the Deceased’s assets and respective entitlement of each beneficiary at Paragraph 5 of the said Affidavit. 6. The Summons for Confirmation of Grant was fixed for hearing on 19th February, 2026 on which date the court proceeded to read out and explain the Grant and its full particulars to the Administrators and Beneficiaries in English language which they all confirmed they understood in open court. The court confirmed the presence of all Administrators and beneficiaries and indication of their respective wills and relationship with the deceased as follows:a) Susan Wanjiku Maru (ID No. 24238570) – Widow b) Viona Wanjiku Maru (ID No.35665699) – Daughter 3

page 3 of 10

c) Jerioth Natalia Maru (ID No.40095498 ) – Daughter 7. The court also went ahead and examined each Administrator and Beneficiary in view of the joint affidavit so as to verify their respective identities, relationship with the Deceased, their views on the appointment of the personal representative/ Administrators, the identified and listed properties or assets and liabilities of the Deceased’s Estate and proposed mode/plan of distribution of the said Estate amongst the beneficiaries to confirm their sentiments on the same. Of significance, it is noted that the Administrators have properly identified all the beneficiaries of the deceased’s estate, and clearly set out the assets and respective entitlement for each beneficiary and all the beneficiaries confirmed and freely affirmed their Consent without raising any objection to the Confirmation of Grant on the assets mode of distribution set out at Paragraph 5 of the Affidavit. 8. Further, the widow Susan Wanjiku Maru also stated that her daughter, SASHA WANJIRU MARU is a minor aged 9 years and she will hold her share in her trust until she attains the age of majority. Determination 9. Having examined all the Administrators and or Beneficiaries of the Deceased’s Estate, the court has also read through the pleadings and documents on record to confirm the Administrators have satisfied the 4

page 4 of 10

threshold set for Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate. 10.The process of Confirmation of Grant is set out under Section 71 of the Law of Succession which provides as follows:[71]. Confirmation of Grants (1)After the expiration of a period of six months, or such shorter period as the court may direct under subsection (3), from the date of any grant of representation, the holder thereof shall apply to the court for confirmation of the grant in order to empower the distribution of any capital assets. (2)Subject to subsection (2A), the court to which application is made, or to which any dispute in respect thereof is referred, may(a)if it is satisfied that the grant was rightly made to the Applicant, and that he is administering, and will administer, the estate according to law, confirm the grant; or (b)if it is not so satisfied, issue to some other person or persons, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 56 and 66 of this Act inclusive, a confirmed grant of letters of administration in respect of the estate, or so 5

page 5 of 10

much thereof as may be unadministered; or (c)order the Applicant to deliver or transfer to the holder of a confirmed grant from any other court all assets of the estate then in his hands or under his control; or (d)postpone Confirmation of the Grant for such period or periods, pending issue of further citations or otherwise, as may seem necessary in all the circumstances of the case: Provided that, in cases of intestacy, the grant of letters of administration shall not be confirmed until the court is satisfied as to the respective identities and shares of all persons beneficially entitled; and when confirmed the grant shall specify all such persons and their respective shares. 11. The principle purpose of confirming the grant is to pave way for the distribution of assets. The provisions of Subsection 2(1) of Section 71 states that “the court be satisfied as to whether the Administrator had properly ascertained all the persons beneficiary entitled to share in the Estate and properly identified the share due to them”. Furthermore, the Section requires that where a Grant of Letters of Administration has been made previously, the court must be satisfied that the person to who the grant 6

page 6 of 10

was made was properly appointed and is fit and willing to administer the Estate according to the law before confirming the grant. By dint of these provisions in the Law of Succession Act, to confirm a grant if satisfied that the grant was rightly made and the Administrators are and will administer the Estate in accordance with the law, and to refuse/decline to confirm or issue a Confirmed Grant to some other person(s) if so warranted by the circumstances. 12. It is now settled that Confirmation of Grant is not a proforma exercise or a mere procedural formality. Rather it is a substantive judicial act (process) through which the court hands legal authority to the distribution of equal assets of a deceased’s estate. As such, before confirmation of Grant, the court must be satisfied as to; (i) the identity and consent of all the present beneficiaries entitled to the deceased’s estate, (ii) The proper quantum or steps to which they are entitled to in order to protect the rights of the estates’ beneficiaries and (iii) Gives effect to the Constitutional guarantee of fair hearing under Article 50 (1) of the Constitution. 13. In this case, the court confirms that the three appointed Administrators of the Deceased’s Estate have filed a Joint Affidavit sworn on 29th January, 7

page 7 of 10

2026 in support of the Summons of Confirmation of Grant. In this affidavit, the Administrators/Applicants have confirmed that they were jointly appointed as such vide a Gazette Notice No. 5222 of 25th April, 2025. They have also identified the Beneficiaries who are not Administrators, as being daughters of the Deceased at Paragraph Four of their Supporting Affidavit, identified the assets of the Deceased’s Estate and set out each beneficiaries’ share and mode of distribution of the said Estate at Paragraph Five (5) thereof. 14. For transparency and fair administration of justice, the Beneficiaries to the Estate of the Deceased were notified of the Summons for Confirmation of Grant and they all attended court where they were examined on oath that they were in agreement to the Confirmation of Grant and mode of distribution, there is no competing claim or allegation of misappropriation, no pending claim for revocation or material irregularity on the face of the record which would ordinarily justify the court to withhold the Confirmation of Grant. 15. Also, the court has confirmed that all the Beneficiaries of the Deceased’s Estate (being daughters of the deceased) signed and filed a Consent in which they have confirmed their agreement to the listed assets/properties alongside a proposed mode or plan of distribution of the Deceased’s Estate as set out at Paragraph Five (5) of the said Supporting Affidavit – pursuant to the 8

page 8 of 10

provisions of Rule 40 (1) (4) and 8 of the Probate and Administration Rules. 16. In view of the aforementioned, the Court is satisfied that the Administrators have demonstrated readiness and competence to complete the administration of the Deceased’s Estate. Therefore, where the entire family is in agreement on the appointment of Administrators, assets listed and mode of distribution, it would defeat the purpose and spirit expressed under Section 71 (supra) which emphasizes that Probate proceedings be facilitated efficiently, and without delay. 17. All in all, this court is satisfied that the Petitioners have met the legal threshold set out under the provisions of Section 71 of the Law of Succession Act by following the requisite steps and filing all the required documents in compliance thereof and disclosed all the beneficiaries and assets of the deceased’s estate while setting out the respective entitlement pursuant to Rule 40 of the Probation and Administration Rules. 18. And there being no pending application by any person(s) seeking to protest the Summons for Confirmation of Grant, this Court proceeds to allow the same and order that:a) That the Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate made to the said Susan Wanjiku Maru, Viona Wanjiku Maru and Jerioth Natalia Maru in this matter, on 24th June, 9

page 9 of 10

2025 to be confirmed. b) The Petitioners be and are hereby appointed as personal representative of the Estate of Late Michael Maru Kanyingi (Deceased) to manage and distribute the assets and liabilities, (if any) thereof pursuant to Section 82(1) of Law of Succession Act. c) A Certificate of Confirmation of Grant to issue as per the Schedule in the Affidavit in support of the Summons for Confirmation of Grant. d) Being a family matter, there shall be no order as to costs. It is so ordered. RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU this 25th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026. HON. D.O CHEPKWONY JUDGE In the presence of: M/S Njogu Counsel for the Administrators/Petitioners C/A: Martin 10

page 10 of 10