REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO. E017 OF 2026 LUKA MURIMI MWANGI……………………..………….APPLICANT -VERSUSREPUBLIC………………………………………………..RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant LUKA MURIMI MWANGI has filed this application seeking review of the sentence imposed upon him by the lower court. 2. The applicant had been arraigned in the Magistrates Court facing a charge of STEALING CONTRARY TO SECITON 268(1) as read with SECTION 275 OF THE PENAL CODE. The particulars of the charge were that “On 25th day of January 2026 at around 1230 hrs at Ngararuma area in Mathira East Sub County within Nyeri County you stole dry coffee berries weighing 15kgs with a total value of Kshs. HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E017/2026 RULING Page 1 of 4
page 1 of 4
10,000/= the property of “CHARLES MACHARIA GITHAIGA.” 3. The applicant pleaded ‘GUILTY’ to the charge. The facts were read out and the applicant maintained his plea of Guilty. He was then convicted as charged. Following his conviction the applicant serve was sentenced to two (2) years imprisonment. 4. The Applicant then filed this application seeking review of his sentence. The ODPP did not oppose the application for review. 5. The Power of the High Court to review sentences is set out in Section 362 of the Penal Code, Cap 63 Laws of Kenya which provides as follows:“The High Court may call for and examine the record of any criminal proceedings before any subordinate Court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed and as to the regularity of any proceedings in any such subordinate court.” HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E017/2026 RULING Page 2 of 4
page 2 of 4
6. The orders which the High Court may make upon revision are provided by Section 364 of the Penal Code. 7. I have carefully perused the record of the proceedings before the lower court. I am satisfied that the correct procedure was followed in all respects. The applicant was accorded all fair trial right as set out in Article 50 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. 8. I note that the applicant pleaded guilty saving judicial time. Following his conviction the applicant was granted an opportunity to mitigate before he was sentenced. 9. Section 275 of the Penal Code provides that “Any person who steals anything capable of being stolen is guilty of the felony termed theft and is liable, unless owing to the circumstances of the theft or the nature of the thing stolen some other punishment is provided to imprisonment for three years.” 10. Therefore the sentence imposed on the applicant was lawful. However in my opinion a fine would have sufficed. I therefore allow this HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E017/2026 RULING Page 3 of 4
page 3 of 4
application for review. The sentence impose by the trial court is hereby set aside. In it space the applicant is sentenced to a fine of Kshs. 20,000/= in default to serve two (2) years imprisonment. It is so ordered. Dated in Nyeri this 31st day of July 2026. ………………………. MAUREEN A. ODERO JUDGE HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E017/2026 RULING Page 4 of 4
page 4 of 4