REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MAKADARA MAKADARA HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E131 OF 2026 ADEN IBRAHIM ALI……………….….………................…1ST APPLICANT SARAH MUSA ABDI…………………………………………2ND APPLICANT -VERSUSREPUBLIC……………………………….…………………… RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicants were on 4 th January, 2026 charged fourthly with assault causing actual bodily harm. They pleaded not guilty. This was after an initial process where it had looked like they were admitting the charge. They changed their minds on the day when facts were to be read. 2. Counsel for the applicants applied for bond. The court stated in its brief ruling that it had come to its attention that the two, through their family had threatened the complainant. How the court’s attention was drawn to that incident is not manifest on record? The court also referred to the fact that the accused persons did not attend court on the first day of plea. For those two reasons bond was denied. It was directed that it will be considered after the complainant has testified. The court referred to its duty to protect victims. 3. This ruling provoked the application dated 18 th June, 2026. The same is expected to be brought under Article 165(6) and Page | 1 MAKADARA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E131 OF 2026
page 1 of 4
(7) of the Constitution and section 362, 364 and 367 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. The applicants are seeking orders: (1) Spent. (2) That this Honourable court be pleased to call for and peruse the record of the proceedings of Makadara Chief Magistrates’ Court Criminal Case No. E2276 of 2026. (3) That this honourable court be pleased to review, vary and/or set aside the ruling of the Honourable Magistrate delivered on 8th June, 2026 and 11th June, 2026 denying the accused persons bail/bond until after the complainant testifies. (4) That this honourable court be pleased to admit the accused persons ADEN IBRAHIM ALI and SARAH MUSA ABDI to bail/bond pending the hearing and determination of the said criminal case subject to such terms and conditions as this court may deem fit. (5) That the costs of this application be on the court. The application is supported by affidavits sworn by the two applicants. (6) When the application came for hearing on 29 th June, 2026, Ms. Ogega for the state indicated that she had no objection to the two being released on bond. She sought stringent bond terms. Page | 2 MAKADARA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E131 OF 2026
page 2 of 4
(7) I placed the file before the Honourable Deputy Registrar so that the court file could be brought up for perusal. The matter came back on 6th July, 2026. (8) As noted the application is one for review. It is brought up under Article 165(6) and (7). I have seen the reasons given in paragraph 3 of the supporting affidavits. While they read like the applicants are challenging the direction of the court, I have picked one issue from the record which is a clear and apparent error on the part of the learned magistrate. (9) The honourable magistrate stated that it had come to his attention that the accused persons through their family members were threatening the complainant. The record does not show that the state addressed the court on that issue. There is no affidavit either by the Investigating Officer or by the complainant. The state did not oppose bond even before this court. appearing now. They are not It is therefore not clear how it became clear to the trial court that the victim was in any danger. The alleged members of the accused persons’ family are not named. (10) In my considered opinion this is not exercise of discretion. It is a decision that is not based on any provisions of the law. It is not in line with the Bail and Bond Policy guidelines. It is for revision. Page | 3 MAKADARA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E131 OF 2026
page 3 of 4
(11) In the result I set aside the ruling on bail delivered on 11th June, 2026. In its place I admit the two applicants to Kshs. 20,000/- cash bail each. (12) The original file is humbly sent back to the trial court for the case to proceed. It is so ordered. Hon. Alex K. Ithuku JUDGE The Court: Ruling delivered in virtual court this 24 th day of July, 2026. Ms. Ogega for Respondent, Ms. Osindi for Applicants. Hon. Alex K. Ithuku JUDGE 24/07/2026 Page | 4 MAKADARA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E131 OF 2026
page 4 of 4