Justus M Munyithya & Faith Mbaika Vanani T/A Kioko, Munyithya, Ngugi & Company Advocates v Occidental Insurance Company Ltd

4. It further deposed that upon conclusion of the said instruction, the Applicant filed the AdvocateClient Bill of Costs. The Bill of Costs was taxed on 18th February 2025 at a sum of Kshs. 335,180/=. 5. It was further deponed that a Certificate of Taxation on the same was issued on 24th February 2025 certifying the taxed amount in the sum of Kshs. 335,180/= 6. The Applicant averred that despite having issued the Respondent several reminders and entreaties, it failed and/or neglected to make good the said taxed costs. 7. It is the Applicant's case that there is no dispute as to the existence of the retainer between the parties and that the Certificate of Taxation has neither been altered nor set aside. Consequently, the Applicant urges the Court to enter Judgment in its favour for the taxed costs together with interest as prescribed by law. 8. Although the Respondent was duly served with the application as evidenced by the Affidavit of Service on record, it failed to file any response. 9. I have considered the Notice of Motion, the Supporting Affidavit, and the Applicant’s plea for entry of the judgment; I am of the view that the following issues fall for determination. 10. Whether the Applicant has satisfied the requirements for entry of Judgment under Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act; and 11. Whether the Applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs, and, if so, from what date 12. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, under which the present application is brought, governs the effect of a Certificate of Taxation and the circumstances under which the Court may enter judgment for taxed costs. The section provides as follows: The certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall, unless it is set aside or altered by the Court, be final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, and the Court may make such order in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including, in a case where the retainer is not disputed, an order that judgement be entered for the sum certified to be due with costs. 13. The legal position regarding Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act is well settled. In the case of Waiganjo Wachira & Company Advocates v Pacis Insurance Company Limited [2020] KEHC 8829 (KLR), the Court reaffirmed that a Certificate of Taxation is final unless and until it is set aside or altered. 14. The Court relied on Owino Okeyo & Company Advocates v Fuelex Kenya Limited [2005] eKLR where it held that: “ In my understanding of the provisions of Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act, it enables an advocate to get judgment for the taxed costs…provided that his client did not dispute the fact that the advocate had been instructed (or retained) in the first instance.” The Court further cited Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N K Brothers Limited [2014] eKLR where it observed that: “ The law is very clear that once a taxing master has taxed the costs, issued a Certificate of costs and there is no reference against his ruling or there has been a ruling and a determination made and not set aside and/or altered, no other action would be required from the court save to enter Judgment.” https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11948/eng@2026-07-30 2

page 2 of 4

15. The material placed before the Court demonstrates that the Applicant's Advocate–Client Bill of Costs was taxed and a Certificate of Taxation was issued by the Deputy Registrar on 24th February 2025 certifying the taxed amount in the sum of Kshs. 335,180/= 16. There is no evidence before this Court that the said Certificate of Taxation has been altered or set aside. Consequently, pursuant to Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the Certificate of Taxation is final as to the amount certified. 17. In the case of Okello t/a Odero & Partners Advocates V Ali (Commercial Miscellaneous Application E1071 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 10339 (KLR) (14 July 2026) (Ruling), the court stated as follows: “ It is now well settled that while the Court must satisfy itself that the retainer is not disputed, such dispute must be real and supported by material placed before the Court. Mere silence on the part of the client cannot, in the circumstances of this case, be construed as raising a dispute regarding the Advocate-Client relationship, particularly where the Bill of costs has been taxed, and no challenge has been lodged against the Certification of Taxation. “ 18. In the present case, the Respondent, despite having been duly served with the application, neither filed a response nor otherwise challenged the existence of the retainer. 19. There is therefore no material before the Court to suggest that the Applicant's retainer is disputed. Similarly, there is no evidence that the Certificate of Taxation has been altered or set aside. 20. I am therefore satisfied that the Applicant has met the requirements for entry of Judgment under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act. 21. On the subject of interest, the Applicant seeks interest at 14% from 10th January 2024 until payment in full. 22. The Respondent did not file any response to oppose this prayer 23. Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order provides that: “ An advocate may charge interest at 14 per cent per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, provided that such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill shall have been paid or tendered in full.” 24. In the present case, the Applicant submitted that the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs was duly served upon the Respondent on the 11th day of December 2024 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Service of James Hiuhu Wanjohi. 25. The Applicant further submitted that despite service of the Bill of Costs, the Respondent failed to settle the taxed costs. 26. It was therefore urged that the Applicant is entitled to interest at the rate of 14% per annum pursuant to Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. 27. In the circumstances, I find that the Applicant is entitled to interest at 14%, one month from the date the Advocate–Client Bill of Costs was served upon the Respondent, that being 10th January 2025, until payment in full. 28. To avoid another round of taxation on and application for entry of judgment on the costs of this application, I exercise my discretion to assess and award the costs of this application at kshs 10,000/- https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11948/eng@2026-07-30 3

page 3 of 4

29. Consequently, the Notice of Motion dated 16th April 2026 is allowed in the following terms: i. Judgment is hereby entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent in the sum of Kshs.335,180/- being the amount certified in the Certificate of Taxation issued on 24th February 2025. ii. Interest on the taxed amount shall run at 14% from 10th January 2025, being one month from the date on which the Advocate-Client Bill of Costs was served upon the Respondent, until payment in full. iii. Costs of the Application assessed at kshs 10,000/- are awarded to the Applicant EMMANUEL BITTA JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT MOMBASA THIS 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 In the presence of: Nechesah C/A Vanani for the Applicant N/A for the Respondent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11948/eng@2026-07-30 4

page 4 of 4