Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joseph Makau Mulatya & 1 other v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVIEW NO. E033 OF 2025 CR.CASE NO. E542 OF 2022 AT MILIMANI MAGISTRATE'S JOSEPH MAKAU MULATYA ...............................................APPLICANT VS REPUBLIC.............................................................................. RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant by way of an undated Certificate of Urgency brought under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code approached this court seeking to have the court review his sentence to take into account the period he had spent in remand before conviction and sentence. 2. This court called for the Lower Court file Milimani Chief Magistrates Case No. E542 of 2025 Republic Vs. Joseph Makau Mulatya in exercise of its powers under Section 362 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. Upon perusal of the trial court’s file, it turned out that the applicant and his co-accused in the Lower Court were sentenced to a period of 5 Years imprisonment on 18/11/2024. In his sentencing notes the learned Honorable magistrate stated that : “the 1st , 3rd and 4th accused are each sentenced to serve five(5) years imprisonment from the date of arraignment in court.” 4. It follows therefore that the learned Honorable magistrate complied with the requirements of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and as a consequence therefore there is nothing to revise in this matter. 5. The prisons to compute sentence from the date of arraignment. NAIROBI HC CR REVISION E 033 OF 2025 – Joseph Makua Mulatya -vsRepublic

page 1 of 2

6. It is the finding of this court that the jurisdiction of the court has been improperly invoked and considering that the applicant was charged with the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296 (2) of the Penal Code the applicant should eternally thank the learned Honorable magistrate for imposing what is manifestly a lenient sentence on the circumstances. 7. The revision application has no merit and the same is hereby dismissed. 8. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED VIRTUALLY at NAIROBI this 26th day of FEBRUARY, 2026. A. M. MUTETI JUDGE In the presence of: Habiba: Court Assistant Applicant: present Mogere for the Respondent NAIROBI HC CR REVISION E 033 OF 2025 – Joseph Makua Mulatya -vsRepublic

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.