Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

kehc-2026-11557

Wainaina & another v Musungu (Civil Appeal E065 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 11557 (KLR) (24 July 2026) (Directions) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 11557 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MURANG'A CIVIL APPEAL E065 OF 2025 DO CHEPKWONY, J JULY 24, 2026 BETWEEN JOHN NDUNG’U WAINAINA ........................................................ 1ST APPLICANT LUCY NJOKI MWAURA ................................................................. 2ND APPLICANT AND ANDREW BULINGA MUSUNGU .................................................... RESPONDENT DIRECTIONS 1. This matter came up for inter-partes hearing of the Respondent/Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 19th June, 2026 on 23rd July, 2026. The application seeks, among other relief, orders intended to facilitate compliance with and enforcement of the judgment of this Court in the appeal, including the surrender of the original burial permit relating to the late Caroline Wanjiku Ndung’u. However, this ruling does not determine the merits of those prayers. 2. according to the Respondent/Applicant’s counsel, Mr. Kipkosgey, the Appellants/Respondents had not filed or placed before the Court any response to the application. Counsel for the Applicants/Respondents nevertheless made oral representations indicating the grounds upon which the application would be opposed. I wish to note that the Court has since received a replying affidavit sworn by John Ndung’u Wainaina on 21st July, 2026 on behalf of both Appellants/Respondents. The affidavit substantially refiects, and develops, the position that was partly outlined before the Court. 3. It is worthnoting that in the interest of fair hearing the Court cannot fairly determine the application by reference only to the partial oral representations made on 23 July 2026. Equally, now that a formal response has been placed on record, it would be prejudicial to the Applicant to determine the application without afiording him an opportunity to address the matters raised in that response. 4. Accordingly, in exercise of the Court’s inherent powers and in furtherance of the just, proportionate and expeditious determination of the application, the following directions are issued: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11557/eng@2026-07-24 1

page 1 of 2

a. The replying affidavit sworn by John Ndung’u Wainaina on 21 July, 2026 shall stand as the Appellants/Respondents’ response to the Notice of Motion dated 19 June 2026. b. The Notice of Motion dated 19 June, 2026 shall be canvassed by way of written submissions. c. The Respondent/Applicant shall file and serve his written submissions within three (3) days of the date of this ruling. d. Upon service of the Respondent/Applicant’s submissions, the Appellants/Respondents shall file and serve their written submissions within three (3) days. e. Each side’s written submissions shall be limited to four (4) pages, excluding copies of the authorities relied upon. f. The ruling on the Notice of Motion shall be delivered electronically on 12th August, 2026 through the Court Tracking System (CTS) by uploading it to the electronic case file. The parties need not attend Court for delivery unless otherwise directed. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA ELECTRONIC CASE TRACKING SYSTEM AT MURANG’A THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 HON. DORAH O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11557/eng@2026-07-24 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.