Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 11173 of 2026

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT VOI PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 46 OF 2016 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST MNJALA (DECEASED) RULING 1. On the 12th June 2026 this Court directed that a Notice to Show Cause Why the Cause should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. The notice was duly served on both Counsel for the parties and they were required to file a Replying Affidavit in response to explain why the parties had failed to prosecute their case and both parties together with their Counsels were absent and no affidavits have been filed as required. 3. The parties were required to attend Court on 22 nd July 2026 to Show Cause Why the Succession Cause should not be dismissed. None of them were in attendance on 22nd July 2026 when the case was called out. 4. This Court notes that that has been the trend from 21 st September 2022. No progressive steps have been taken since RULING P&A 46 OF 2016 1

page 1 of 2

then when the parties and beneficiaries were directed to be in attendance. 5. No explanation has been given for the dormancy of approximately four (4) years. 6. It is this Court’s considered view that the parties have not demonstrated any interest in prosecuting this cause to its logical conclusion. 7. For those reasons the Succession Cause is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and delivered via Teams this 22 nd day of July 2026 in open court at Voi High Court. A. MSHILA JUDGE In the presence of:Court Assistant: Millicent/Trizah N/A by parties RULING P&A 46 OF 2016 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.