Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Faraji Omar Bakari v Odpp

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARSEN HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.E048 OF 2026 FARAJI OMAR BAKARI…….………………….………. APPLICANT VERSUS ODPP………..……………………..…………..……. …….RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant has filled an undated application seeking for review of the sentence of 3 years imprisonment that was imposed on him for possession of wildlife trophies, to wit, 4 pieces of elephant tusks. 2. The grounds in support of the application are that the applicant was a first offender at the time of sentence. That he has undergone rehabilitation and is fully reformed. That he was in college before he was sentenced. 3. I have considered the application. The applicant was charged with a serious offence of possession of elephant tusks. The offence carries a sentence of not less than 5 years imprisonment. The applicant was sentenced to a lenient sentence of 3 years. 4. I do not see any merit in the application and same is dismissed. HCCR.REV.CASE.NO.E048/2026 RULING 1|Page

page 1 of 2

Ruling delivered, dated and signed at GARSEN this 21 st July 2026. J.N.NJAGI JUDGE In the presence of: Ms. Mkongo for Respondent Applicant – present virtually Court Assistant – Jumaa HCCR.REV.CASE.NO.E048/2026 RULING 2|Page

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.