Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 10956 of 2026

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT VOI JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. E009 OF 2025 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY STEPHEN SALEKA NJUMWA FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF MANDAMUS AND IN THE MATTER OF ORDER 53 RULE 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES AND ALL ENABLING PROVISIONS OF LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF THE FAIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ACT (CAP 71( AND THE FAIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION RULES 2024 AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 8 AND 9 OF THE LAW REFORM ACT, CAP 26 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 21 OF THE LAW REFORM ACT, CAP 26 LAWS OF KENYA RULING JR NO. E009 OF 2025 1 Page 1 of 3

page 1 of 3

AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 21 OF GOVERNMENT PROCEEDING ACT CAP 40 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 47 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REPUBLIC OF KENYA.……………………………………..…..…… APPLICANT =VERSUS= COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF TAITA TAVETA...………….. 1ST RESPONDENT COUNTY OFFICER OF FINANCE TAITA TAVETA……….2ND RESPONDENT THE COUNTY SECRETARY TAITA TAVETA COUNTY......3RD RESPONDENT THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TAITA TAVETA COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD…………….…………..4TH RESPONDENT RULING RULING JR NO. E009 OF 2025 2 Page 2 of 3

page 2 of 3

1. Application allowed as it was duly served and no responses filed. 2. Warrant of arrests to issue to 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents. 3. Warrants of arrest be effected by OCS Mwatate. 4. Respondents be committed to civil jail for period of 30 days. 5. Applicant to meet expenses of upkeep. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and delivered via Teams this 20 th day of July 2026 in open court at Voi High Court. A. MSHILA JUDGE In the presence of:Court Assistant: Millicent/Trizah Wambura for the Applicant RULING JR NO. E009 OF 2025 3 Page 3 of 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.