Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Amos Ngolanya Masya v Republic

Masya v Republic (Criminal Revision E105 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 10184 (KLR) (13 July 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 10184 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION E105 OF 2026 DR KAVEDZA, J JULY 13, 2026 BETWEEN AMOS NGOLANYA MASYA .................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged and convicted of the ofience of dealing in wildlife trophy without a permit contrary to section 92(2) of the Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013. He was sentenced to serve seven (7) years’ imprisonment. 2. The applicant has filed the present application dated 22nd June 2026 seeking sentence review. He contends that the trial court failed to consider the period spent in remand custody before sentencing, contrary to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He therefore urges the Court to revise the commencement date of his sentence. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds advanced, the record and the applicable law. 4. The proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code imposes a mandatory duty on a sentencing court to consider the period an accused person has spent in lawful custody before sentence. This principle has been afirmed by the Court of Appeal in Ahamad Abolfathi Mohammed & Another v Republic [2018] eKLR and Bethwel Wilson Kibor v Republic [2009] Eklr, and by the High Court in Vincent Sila Jona & 87 Others v Kenya Prison Service & 2 Others [2021] eKLR. 5. It is therefore mandatory upon every sentencing court to consider the period spent in pre-trial custody unless the law expressly provides otherwise. The trial court record indicates that the applicant was arrested on 20th July 2020 and, was thereafter released on cash bail terms on 2nd July 2021. The applicant was therefore held in remand custody for a period of eleven (11) months and twelve (12) days prior to his conviction and sentence. From the record, that the period was not factored in during his sentencing. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10184/eng@2026-07-13 1

page 1 of 2

6. Consequently, the application is merited and is hereby partially allowed. The sentence imposed by the trial court shall be computed less by eleven (11) months and twelve (12) days, in accordance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, Cap. 75. Laws of Kenya. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 2026 ______________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE In the presence of: Applicant Present Mutuma for the Respondent Karimi Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10184/eng@2026-07-13 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.