Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ronak Raj Shah v Famous Travel Limited

In re Estate of Shah (Deceased) (Commercial Miscellaneous Application E007 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 9886 (KLR) (6 July 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 9886 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E007 OF 2026 JM NANG'EA, J JULY 6, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE PREMCHAND NANGPAR SHAH (DECEASED) BETWEEN RONAK RAJ SHAH ................................................................................ APPLICANT AND FAMOUS TRAVEL LIMITED ............................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. 2. By Notice of Motion dated 22/4/2026, brought ex-parte, the following orders are sought; a. Spent. b. That this Honourable Court be pleased to order the rectification of the register of members of Famous Travels Limited by reinstating the thirty-three (33) ordinary shares as registered in the name of the Applicant in favour of the estate of Premchand Nangpar Shah. c. That prayer (b) above be done without the requirement of execution by the administrator of the said estate, who has since died and the Register of Companies do give effect to the said rectification. d. That in the alternative to prayer (b) and (c) above, this Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order directing the Registrar of Companies to effect all requisite entries in the register of members of Famous Travels Limited thereby completing the rectification. e. That the costs of this Application be in the cause. The Motion is supported by Applicant’s affidavit evidence. There is evidence of service of the Application upon the Respondent company but no reply has been filed. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9886/eng@2026-07-06 1

page 1 of 2

3. I have perused the Applicant’s affidavit against the Application, and considering that the same is unopposed, I allow prayers (b) and (c) thereof. 4. No order is made as to costs of the Application. 5. Ruling accordingly. RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026. J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE. In the presence of: Mr. Opondo Advocate for Mr. Situma Advocate for the Applicant Respondent, Absent Court Assistant (Jeniffer) https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9886/eng@2026-07-06 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.