Spte Sylvester Muli v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. E066 OF 2026 SPTE SYLVESTER MULI……………………………….…………… APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………………………………………….RESPONDE NT RULING. 1. The applicant was charged and after a full trial convicted of two counts of Attempted Murder Contrary to Section 220 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to serve 20 years' imprisonment. 2. He filed the present application dated 11 th May 2026 seeking sentence review. He argued that the time spent in custody has been sufficient rehabilitation. He urged the court to revise his sentence to a non-custodial sentence. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds in support and the applicable law. From the record of the trial court, the court considered the applicants mitigation, the time spent in remand custody and the fact that the applicants were first offenders before sentencing. Having considered the application in its totality. The sentence imposed was also legal in the circumstances of the case. 4. In the premises, I find no good cause or reason to revise the sentence imposed by the trial court. The application is dismissed for lacking in merit. Orders accordingly. Ruling dated and delivered virtually this 22 nd day of June 2026

page 1 of 2