Foursons’ Holdings (K) Ltd v County Government of Migori (Commercial Miscellaneous Application E003 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 8446 (KLR) (11 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 8446 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E003 OF 2025 ACA ONG’INJO, J JUNE 11, 2026 BETWEEN FOURSONS’ HOLDINGS (K) LTD .................................... EX PARTE APPLICANT AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF MIGORI ............................................ DEFENDANT RULING 1. This matter was coming up for enforcement of the arbitral award dated 19th March 2025 by the interested party. The Respondents in HCCOMMArb No. E001 of 2025 sought for orders in application dated 10th September 2025 pursuant to provisions of order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, section 35 of the Arbitration Act 1995 and rule 7 of the Arbitration Rules seeking that the proceedings herein be stayed pending hearing and determination of the application and that the arbitral award be set aside. 2. During the pendency of the ruling in the twin files for orders in respective files this court learnt that the ex-parte applicant’s counsel Mr. Macharia had filed a letter in the CTS dated 5th May 2026 indicating that the respondent had settled the principal arbitral award of Kshs. 14,994,461.60 and in the circumstances the application herein is marked as settled with costs to the ex-parte applicant. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MIGORI THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026. HON. ANNE ADWERA - ONG’INJO JUDGE In the presence of: Victor – Court Assistant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8446/eng@2026-06-11 1
Original judgment
Foursons’ Holdings (k) Ltd v County Government of Migori
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.