Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Njue

Republic v Njue (Criminal Case E022 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 7757 (KLR) (3 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 7757 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT EMBU CRIMINAL CASE E022 OF 2024 RM MWONGO, J JUNE 3, 2026 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND JOHN KARIUKI NJUE ............................................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. Upon close of the prosecution’s case and the counsel for the parties having requested the Court to rely on the record, the court has considered all the evidence availed by the prosecution. 2. The court is required under Section 306 CPC to rule on whether a prima facie case to answer is made out requiring the accused to be placed on his defence. 3. Upon considering the said evidence, the court finds that a prima facie case has been made out. Accordingly, the accused shall be placed on his defence. He is advised that he may give sworn evidence with or without witnesses, or he may give unsworn evidence with or without witnesses or he may opt to remain silent and adduce evidence through witnesses. 4. Accused shall advise the court of his choice. 5. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU HIGH COURT THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026. .......................... R. MWONGO JUDGE Delivered in the presence of: 1. Accused Present in Court https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7757/eng@2026-06-03 1

page 1 of 2

2. Mageto for Accused 3. Ms. Mwaniki for the State 4. Francis Munyao - Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7757/eng@2026-06-03 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.