Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Mathew Wabwire Alias Baba Daisy Were & 1 other

Republic v Wabwire alias Baba Daisy Were & another (Criminal Case E017 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 6944 (KLR) (15 May 2026) (Sentence) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 6944 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA CRIMINAL CASE E017 OF 2024 SM MOHOCHI, J MAY 15, 2026 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND MATHEW WABWIRE ALIAS BABA DAISY WERE ......................... 1ST ACCUSED JOSEPH ADUNGO PAADE .................................................................. 2ND ACCUSED SENTENCE 1. The accused was charged with the ofience of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code;It is alleged that he killed Jackline Naliaka, hereafter the deceased, on 26th November 2024, at Khuluanda Village, Kapina Sub-Location, Nambale Sub-County, Busia, he denied the charges, and a trial was conducted. The prosecution presented 10 witnesses and the court found the charge was proved beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly convicted him for the ofience; 2. The deceased was hit by a blunt object (metal rod) on the head with the deceased taking flight into a nearby maize plantation. 3. In mitigation counsel for the convicts indicated remorsefulness for events giving rise to this case. That from the pre-sentence report the convict is a young family man, sole breadwinner of his family. 4. That the Pre-sentence report indicates the convict is 46 years old a father of three children while the deceased was of advanced age leaving behind eight adult children the report leaves it to the courts discretion on sentence. 5. The driver of this ofience was a longstanding land dispute. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6944/eng@2026-05-15 1

page 1 of 2

Analysis 6. It is the duty of this court to impose a sentence that meets the facts and circumstances of the case; this court has considered the full circumstances of the ofience which is contained in the Facts; 7. The applicable law on sentence for the ofience of Murder is found under the provisions of Section 24 of the Penal Code which reads as follows; “ Any person who is convicted of murder shall be sentenced to death". 8. The section provides for the maximum sentence, that is death; this court has taken into consideration the aggravating circumstances in that he used a deadly weapon namely iron rod in committing the ofience; the deceased was and elderly lady incapable of a physical fight but the convict elected to visit upon her extreme violence in an ambush fashion inflicting the fatal injuries; 9. The mitigating factors taken into consideration by this court are that the convict is a 1st time ofienders with no previous criminal record, he is family man with young children and has also expressed remorse; 10. The Court has considered the mitigating circumstances as well as the aggravating circumstances and is persuaded that while the court shall not impose the maximum sentence an imprisonment as a deterrent sentence is appropriate under the circumstances 11. This Court accordingly imposes an imprisonment Sentence on both convicts of twenty-five (25) years to run from the 19th December 2024. 12. The convict shall be entitled to the prison remission should he be of good conduct while serving the sentence. 13. The convicts have a right to Appeal within 14 days It is so Ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT BUSIA ON THIS DAY OF 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 MOHOCHI S.M. PRESIDING JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6944/eng@2026-05-15 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.