LNN v JNC (Matrimonial Cause E005 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 6746 (KLR) (18 May 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 6746 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU MATRIMONIAL CAUSE E005 OF 2023 JM NANG'EA, J MAY 18, 2026 BETWEEN LNN ............................................................................................................ APPLICANT AND JNC ......................................................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. By Notice of Motion dated 9th february 2026, the Applicant seeks orders as hereunder;1. Spent. 2. That the Honourable Court in the interim do issue an order of temporary injunction restraining the Respondent, his servants, agents or assigns from alienating, leasing, charging, sub-dividing, interfering and or dealing in any manner whatsoever with land parcel Nakuru Municipality Block 22/4000 (Muguga), which is among the properties referred to as “suit properties” herein pending the hearing and determination of this application inter parties and the suit filed herein. 3. That the Honourable Court in the interim do order that the status quo be maintained as it were at the time of filing the suit herein on land parcels Bahati/Kabatino block 1/6364, Nakuru Municipality Block 25/984, Nakuru Municipality Block 1/299 (Langalanga), Nakuru Municipality Block 22/4000 (Muguga), and Dundori/Miroreni Block 2/2670 (Ndimu) all referred as “suit properties” pending the hearing and determination of this application inter parties and the suit filed herein. 4. That the costs of this application be provided for. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6746/eng@2026-05-18 1
page 1 of 2
2. The Application is supported by the Applicant’s affidavit. In a nutshell, she complains that the Respondent has unlawfully commenced construction activity on a disputed property known as Nakuru/Municipality Block 22/4000 (Muguga) despite pendency of this suit. 3. The Respondent has not replied to the Application despite evidence of service thereof upon him. The Application is thus deemed as unopposed. 4. Consequently, prayers 2 and 3 of the Motion are granted pending hearing and determination of the suit. The costs of the Application shall be in the cause. J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE. RULING DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 18TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 IN THE ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES AND/OR THEIR ADVOCATES. J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6746/eng@2026-05-18 2
page 2 of 2