High Court 6135 of 2026

suitability as adoptive parents. The applicants want to enjoy parenthood and give the child an opportunity to a good life. 4. The report from the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection - State Department of Social Security and Protection Department of Children’s Services (Nairobi County) dated 10th March ,2026 indicates that the child is male and was born on 13th March 2024 at Mbagathi hospital where the biological mother abandoned him on 21st March, 2024. The matter was reported at Kenyatta Police Station, where it was booked vide OB number 11/21/03/2024. He was referred to New Life Home Trust on the same date for care and protection. On 26th April 2024, the sub-county children’s officer for Kibra wrote to the Court recommending that the child in question be committed to the New Life Home Trust for 3 months. On 30th August 2024, the children’s Court at Nairobi committed the child to the care of the institution vide protection and care case number E423/2024. He remained at the institution until he was placed with the Applicant on 14/9/2025. 5. The child was declared free for adoption by Buckner Kenya Adoption Services on 9th June, 2025 vide freeing Certificate Serial Number 0879. Pending hearing of the application before this Court DAO, was appointed as Guardian ad Litem of the child. She recommended that the Applicants were excellent parents for the child. 6. AMM and WWN, the proposed Child’s legal guardians, are good friends of the applicants. They verified vide letters of consent dated 19th February 2025 affirming their commitment. 7. The child is a Kenyan citizen by virtue of Article 14 (1) which provides that a person is a citizen by birth if on the day of the person’s birth, whether or not the person is born in Kenya, either the mother or father of the person is a citizen. 8. In light of the best interests of the child principle provided for under Article 53 (2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 and the 1st Schedule of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022, this Court has an obligation to prioritize the child’s best interests in making decisions touching on her. a. Article 53 of the Constitution, 2010 states that a child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child. b. Sections 8 (1), (2) and (3) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides as follows; 1. 2. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public of private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies: a. The best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration; b. The best interests of the child shall include, but shall not be limited to the considerations set out in the First Schedule. All judicial and administrative institutions, and all persons acting in the name of such institutions, when exercising any powers conferred under this Act or any other written law, shall treat the interests of the child as the first and paramount consideration to the extent that this is consistent with adopting a course of action calculated to:a. safeguard and promote the rights and welfare of the child; b. conserve and promote the welfare of the child; and https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6135/eng@2026-04-30 2

page 2 of 4

c. 3. c. secure for the child such guidance and correction as is necessary for the welfare of the child, and in public interest. In any matters affecting a child, the child shall be accorded an opportunity to express their opinion, and that opinion shall be taken into account in appropriate cases, having regard to the child’s age and degree of maturity. The First Schedule as provided for under Section 8 (1) of the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022 provides best interests considerations to be as follows: 1. The age, maturity, stage of development, gender, background and any other relevant characteristics of the child. 2. Distinct special needs (if any) arising from chronic ailment or disability. 3. The relationship of the child with the child’s parent (s) and/ or guardian(s) and any other persons who may significantly affect the child’s welfare. 4. The preference of the child, if old enough to express a meaningful preference. 5. The duration and adequacy of the child’s current living arrangements and the desirability of maintaining continuity. 6. The stability of any proposed living arrangements for the child. 7. The motivation of the parties involved and their capacities to give the child love, affection and guidance. 8. The child’s adjustment to the child’s present home, school and community. 9. The capacity of each parent or guardian to allow and encourage frequent and continuing contact between the child and the other parent and/or guardian(s), including physical access. 10. The capacity of each parent and/or guardian(s) to cooperate or to learn to cooperate in child care. 11. Methods for assisting parental and/or guardian cooperation and resolving disputes and each parent’s/guardian’s willingness to use those methods. 12. The effect of the child if one parent/guardian has sole authority over the child’s upbringing. 13. The existence of domestic abuse between the parents/guardian(s), in the past or currently, and how that abuse affects the emotional stability and physical safety of the child. 14. The existence of any history of child abuse by a parent and/or guardian(s); or anyone residing in the same dwelling as the child. 15. Where the child is under one year of age, whether the child is being breast - fed. 16. The existence of a parent’s(s) or guardian’s(s) conviction for a sex offense or a sexually violent offense under the Sexual Offences Act. 17. Where there is a person residing with a parent or guardian, whether that person; - https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6135/eng@2026-04-30 3

page 3 of 4

18. a. Has been convicted of a crime under this Act, the Sexual Offences Act, the Penal Code or any other legislation. b. Has been adjudicated of a juvenile offence which, if the person had been an adult at the time of the offence, the person would have been convicted of a felony. Any other factor which may have a direct or indirect effect on the physical and psychological well -being of the child. 9. The report from the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection - State Department of Social Security and Protection Department of Children’s Services (Nairobi County), the report from Buckner Kenya Adoption Services, the guardian ad litem and the proposed legal guardians indicate that the child will be well taken care of in the care and custody of the adoptive parents. 10. I find that this adoption gives the child a chance at a better life and education in a loving and stable home with the adoptive parents. 11. In the circumstances, I allow the originating summons dated 20th January, 2026 and make the following orders: a. The Applicants, RGK and LCK, are authorized to adopt the child known as Baby JT alias DC. b. Upon adoption, the child shall be known as NRG. c. AMM and WWN be appointed as legal guardians of the child. d. The Registrar General is directed to make the relevant entries in the Adopted Children’s Register in respect of the child. e. The Registrar of births and deaths is directed to issue a birth certificate in respect of the child’s new name. f. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. It is so ordered. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THROUGH THE MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE PLATFORM ON THIS 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026. ……………………….. C. KENDAGOR JUDGE In the presence of: Court Assistant: Beryl Ms. Kimenyi for the Applicant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6135/eng@2026-04-30 4

page 4 of 4