Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Patrick Kimani Ngabu & 1 other v Isaac Njai Mwangi

Ngabu & another v Mwangi (Civil Appeal E033 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 5127 (KLR) (16 April 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 5127 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MURANG'A CIVIL APPEAL E033 OF 2026 DO CHEPKWONY, J APRIL 16, 2026 BETWEEN PATRICK KIMANI NGABU ............................................................ 1ST APPELLANT KELVIN WARAGA ........................................................................... 2ND APPELLANT AND ISAAC NJAI MWANGI ....................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. The matter is for mention for parties to take direction on Notice of Motion application dated 31st March, 2026 in which the Appellant is seeking for: a. Spent. b. This Honourable court be pleased to stay execution of the lower court judgment dated 23rd March, 2026 and all consequential orders arising therefrom until the appeal filed by the appellant against the Judgment is heard and determined or until further orders of this court. c. The costs herein be costs in the cause. 2. The application is supported by grounds set out on its face and reiterated in the affidavit sworn by Kelvin Waraga on 31st March, 2026. The application was served upon the Respondent’s counsel with direction that they attend court for hearing of the matter. 3. Counsel for both parties have indeed attended court and it is confirmed that the Respondents counsel were served with the application and directions. 4. Counsel for the Respondents informed court that they had not filed a response and requested that they be granted leave to file and serve their response within fourteen (14) days. It however, went on to state that they would be amenable to conceding to the application on condition that the decretal suit https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/5127/eng@2026-04-16 1

page 1 of 2

is deposited in a joint account of both advocates or the court as security for the due performance of the decree. The second proposal has not been opposed by the Applicant/Defendant. 5. Having listened to both counsel for the parties herein, I have equally read through the grounds upon which the application is prescribed both on its face and affidavit in support thereof. 6. I find that the Application has been filed without undue delay, the applicant has demonstrated likelihood of suffering irreparable loss and expressed willingness to comply with the condition of depositing the decretal sum as security for due performance of the decree pursuant to the provision under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules stay of execution. 7. In view of this, the Notice of Motion application dated 31st March, 2026 is hereby allowed in the following terms: 8. a. That there be a stay of execution of the lower court judgment dated 23rd March, 2026 and all consequential orders arising therefrom until the appeal herein is heard and determined on condition that the Respondent deposit the entire decretal sum in court as security for the said performance of the decree within thirty (30) days form the date hereof. b. The draft Memorandum of Appeal dated 27th March, 2026 be and is hereby decreed as duly filed and served. c. The Deputy Registrar to call for and avail the original record of proceedings in Murang’a Sccc No. E008 of 2026, Patrick Karani Ngabu & Anr v Isaac Njai Mwangi. d. Failure to comply with the condition set out under (c) above, the application will be rendered automatically dismissed. e. Mention on 18th May, 2026 for parties to confirm compliance of the above direction and file further direction as being of the appeal. It is so ordered. RULING DELIVERED THIS 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026. HON. D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/5127/eng@2026-04-16 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.