Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Simon Ndegwa Maina

Republic v Maina (Criminal Case E088 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 4712 (KLR) (19 March 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 4712 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE E088 OF 2024 JM NANG'EA, J MARCH 19, 2026 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND SIMON NDEGWA MAINA ......................................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused is charged with Murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the information presented before the court state that on the night of 17th February 2024 at Sewage Area of Rhonda, Nakuru West Sub county , in Nakuru County, he murdered Isaack Kamau . The accused entered plea of “Not Guilty” to the offence. 2. I have perused the evidence adduced by 12 witnesses the prosecution called and note that the defence did not offer submissons “on no case to answer”. At this stage, the prosecution is required to make out a prima facie case warranting putting of the accused on his defence or else the accused be acquitted pursuant to the provisions of section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. In the famous case of Ramanlal T. Bhatt vs Republic, a prima facie case was defined as one in which the court could convict if no defence is offered by the accused. That is not to say, however, that the court will be prepared to convict in every case where the accused fails to give defence. The decision of the court depends on the facts and circumstances of each case while taking into account that the accused has the constitutional right to remain silent. 4. Without delving into further details at this stage, I find that the prosecution has made out a prima facie case and the accused is hereby put on his defence. It is established judicial practice that no reasons ought to be given for such decision so that an impression is not created that the court has already made up its mind before hearing the defence case. 5. Ruling accordingly. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/4712/eng@2026-03-19 1

page 1 of 2

J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE. RULING DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED ON THIS 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026. In the presence of: The Prosecution Counsel, Mr Wakasyaka. The Defence Counsel, Mr Sanjay. Accused. The Court Assistant, Jeniffer. J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/4712/eng@2026-03-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.