Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Alfred Barasa Omondi v Christopher Ochieng Nyang’eya

Omondi v Nyang’eya (Civil Appeal E002 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 4683 (KLR) (10 April 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 4683 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA CIVIL APPEAL E002 OF 2026 WM MUSYOKA, J APRIL 10, 2026 BETWEEN ALFRED BARASA OMONDI ................................................................ APPELLANT AND CHRISTOPHER OCHIENG NYANG’EYA ...................................... RESPONDENT (Appeal from judgement and decree, of Hon. Kassim Akida, Resident Magistrate/ Adjudicator, delivered on 30th December 2025, in Busia SCCCOMM No. E332 of 2025) RULING 1. I am called upon to determine an application, dated 21st January 2026. It seeks stay of execution pending appeal. An appeal has been filed herein, and the application herein is filed within the appeal. 2. To do justice to both sides, I do hereby allow the said application. Let the appellant deposit in court the total decretal sum of Kshs. 89,959.00, in 30 days, in default of which the stay order shall automatically lapse. 3. Let the appellant file and serve his record of appeal, within 30 days. The matter shall be mentioned, on 14th May 2026, for directions on disposal of the appeal. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, VIA EMAIL, DATED AND SIGNED IN CHAMBERS, AT MILIMANI, NAIROBI, ON THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2026. WM MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant. Advocates https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/4683/eng@2026-04-10 1

page 1 of 2

Mr. Kakinga, instructed by Bitala & Kakinga, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Okutta, instructed by Ouma-Okutta & Associates, Advocates for the respondent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/4683/eng@2026-04-10 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.