Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Andjoel Okari Mawombo Alias Victor Orina

Republic v Mawombo alias Victor Orina (Criminal Case E018 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 4439 (KLR) (5 March 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 4439 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NYAMIRA CRIMINAL CASE E018 OF 2023 TW CHERERE, J MARCH 5, 2026 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND ANDJOEL OKARI MAWOMBO ALIAS VICTOR ORINA .................... ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused person, Joel Okari Mawombo alias Victor Orina, is charged with the ofience of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The particulars are that on 04th September 2023 at Nyanderema Village, Miruka Sub-Location, West Mugirango Location, Nyamira South Sub-County within Nyamira County, he murdered Nelco Ngota Barake. 3. The prosecution called six (6) witnesses before closing its case. The Court is now called upon to determine whether the accused has a case to answer within the meaning of section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. The test to be applied at this stage is settled in Bhatt v Republic [1957] EA 332, where it was held that a prima facie case is established where the prosecution evidence, if uncontroverted, would warrant a conviction. The Court cautioned that a trial court is not required at this stage to make definitive findings on credibility or to determine whether the case has been proved beyond reasonable doubt. The question is whether there is evidence upon which a reasonable tribunal, properly directing itself, could convict if the accused elected to remain silent. 5. I have considered the totality of the prosecution evidence on record in light of that principle. 6. Without delving into an evaluation of credibility or making definitive findings of fact, the prosecution evidence, taken at its highest and without evaluating credibility, establishes prima facie proof of the https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/4439/eng@2026-03-05 1

page 1 of 2

death of the deceased, the cause of that death, and material placing the accused in circumstances connecting him with the fatal act. If left unanswered, that evidence could sustain a conviction. 7. Accordingly, I find that a prima facie case has been established against the accused person. 8. Pursuant to section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I find that the accused has a case to answer and he is hereby placed on his defence. 9. Defence hearing on 14th April 2026 DELIVERED AT NYAMIRA THIS 05TH DAY OF MARCH WAMAE.T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Appearances Court Assistant - Anita Accused - Present For Accused - Ms. Shilwatso For the DPP - Mr. Chirchir (SADPP) https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/4439/eng@2026-03-05 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.