Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Audax Ntebe

Republic v Ntebe (Criminal Revision E008 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 3417 (KLR) (13 March 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 3417 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA CRIMINAL REVISION E008 OF 2022 WM MUSYOKA, J MARCH 13, 2026 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND AUDAX NTEBE ................................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. The revision herein was sought, by the applicant, through a letter dated 5th May 2022, which was received in court on 23rd May 2022. The ruling, challenged in the revision application, was delivered in May 2021. The Republic, after it lodged the revision application, has taken no steps to advance it. 2. The letter, applying for review, talks of the criminal case, in No. 1155 of 2021, being consolidated with other cases, yet those other criminal cases are not mentioned in the letter, neither have I seen any reference to them in the original trial court records. 3. I am unable to find clarity, on what the issues are, hence I am unable to revise the ruling in question. The order, that commends itself to me, is to dismiss the revision application, which I hereby do. The instant file shall be closed. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT, AT BUSIA, ON THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2026. W MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant. Advocates Mr. Onanda, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the applicant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/3417/eng@2026-03-13 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.