Republic v Suez (Criminal Revision E017 of 2022) [2026] KEHC 3416 (KLR) (13 March 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 3416 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUSIA CRIMINAL REVISION E017 OF 2022 WM MUSYOKA, J MARCH 13, 2026 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................. APPLICANT AND HARIR SUEZ ........................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The revision herein was sought by the applicant, through a letter dated 6th June 2022. 2. I cannot make head or tail of the matter. It would appear that there was an acquittal, but there is no material to show that a trial was ever conducted. There is a photocopy of a handwritten ruling, on a case to answer, yet no trial was ever conducted in the file. 3. The Republic, which is the applicant herein, has not made any submissions in the matter, and has never sought to advance the matter. The record, to my mind, is incomplete, and I am unable to decipher what might have exactly happened. 4. The order, that commends itself to me, is to dismiss the revision application, which I hereby do. The instant file shall be closed. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT, AT BUSIA, ON THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2026. W MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant. Advocates Mr. Onanda, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the applicant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/3416/eng@2026-03-13 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.