Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Dorcas Njeri Maina & 1 other v Faith Nyambura Gatete

In re Estate of Paul Gatete Kiratu (Deceased) (Succession Cause E003 of 2020) [2026] KEHC 3204 (KLR) (17 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 3204 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU SUCCESSION CAUSE E003 OF 2020 SM MOHOCHI, J FEBRUARY 17, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF PAUL GATETE KIRATU (DECEASED) BETWEEN DORCAS NJERI MAINA .................................................................. 1ST APPLICANT PRISCILLA MUTHONI WANGAI ................................................. 2ND APPLICANT AND FAITH NYAMBURA GATETE .......................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. What is before me is a summons dated 30th October, 2025 by the 2 co-administrators from the 1st house. 2. They seek injunctive relief against the co-administrators from the 2nd house and in particular rental procee4ds from the property knowns as Nakuru Municipality Block 10/43 to be channelled into a SMEP Bank Account No.12792832. 3. The Applicants equally seeks the appointment of Estate Management Company to collect the rental proceeds. 4. The application is opposed on the grounds that; 5. The subject property is subject to ownership dispute currently pending determination in Nakuru ELC No. E007 of 2022. 6. That the application is another effort to stall the succession herein. 7. That in Succession Cause No.43 of 2019 the Court ordered on 14th January, 2022 on rental proceeds collection which orders are in force and not varied are set aside. 8. This Court recalls its jurisdiction to deal with assets constituting the estate of the deceased. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/3204/eng@2026-02-17 1

page 1 of 2

9. This Court further notes the admission of the Applicant on the contestation of the ownership of Nakuru Municipality Block 10/43 that is pending before the ELC Court. 10. By dint of the dispute this Court is yet to include this property as constituting the estate of the deceased the same awaits determination of Nakuru ELC No. E007/2022. 11. The Applicants have not demonstrated any merits in this application. 12. On the limb that currently the Nakuru Municipality Block 10/43 is registered in the names of Francis Macharia, Daniel Maina, Margaret Njeri and Ruth Gatete. 13. The Applicants have not demonstrated any merits in this application. 14. On the limb that currently the Nakuru Municipality Block 10/43 is registered in the names of Francis Macharia, Daniel Maina, Margaret Njeri and Ruth Gatete. 15. The Respondent is the administrator is the personal representative in the estate of Ruth Gatete. 16. The other 3 co-tenants on the lease were never enjoined and any orders sought or granted without their participation shall be prejudicing. 17. I am unable to trace any merit in this application. 18. I am constrained to condemn the applicants to costs of this Application assessed at Kshs.30,000/= payable to the Respondent. 19. The application dated 30th October, 2025 is dismissed for want of merit. 20. I direct and order that a grant be made in favour of: i. Dorcas Njeri Maina ii. Priscilla Muthoni Wangai iii. Elizabeth Njeri Gatete iv. Faith Nyambura Gatete 21. The administrators shall file a summons for confirmation of grant with proposed distribution mode within 30 days. 22. Any administrators disagreeing with the summons for confirmation of grant shall file an affidavit of protest including his/her proposed mode of distribution within 45 days. 23. This matter shall be mentioned for compliance and further directions on 20th April, 2026. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU ON THIS DAY OF 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 S. MOHOCHI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/3204/eng@2026-02-17 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.