Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Hamisi Tayari Kazungu & 1 other

Republic v Kazungu & another (Criminal Case E004 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 2816 (KLR) (25 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 2816 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE E004 OF 2023 AN ONGERI, J FEBRUARY 25, 2026 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND HAMISI TAYARI KAZUNGU ............................................................... 1ST ACCUSED SULEIMAN CHIGAMBA ZEMBE ....................................................... 2ND ACCUSED RULING 1. I have considered the reasons for the application for adjournment. 2. Indeed it is true yesterday there were two witnesses who were online virtually the whole day. 3. I find that there is good reason for this court to depart from the order granting the prosecution the last adjournment. 4. I grant the prosecution one more chance to call their witnesses. 5. Hearing on 10th March 2026. Remanded in custody. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI. ASENATH ONGERI JUDGE In the presence of:Prosecutor: Ms. Kanyuira Court Assistant: Mabishi/Millicent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/2816/eng@2026-02-25 1

page 1 of 2

The Accused present in court Mr. Mosioma for Accused 1 Mr. Mwanyumba for Accused 2 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/2816/eng@2026-02-25 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.