Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

The Republic v Timothy Leshamata Chamomo & 2 others

Republic v Chamomo & 2 others (Criminal Case 4 of 2020) [2026] KEHC 2762 (KLR) (5 March 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 2762 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE 4 OF 2020 AN ONGERI, J MARCH 5, 2026 BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC ................................................................................... PROSECUTOR AND TIMOTHY LESHAMATA CHAMOMO .............................................. 1ST ACCUSED KENNEDY MBAYI ................................................................................ 2ND ACCUSED IBRAHIM GUYO HASSAN .................................................................. 3RD ACCUSED RULING 1. Upon considering the evidence adduced before the prosecution, this court finds that the prosecution has adduced prima facie evidence to warrant the accused persons to be laced on their defence. 2. This court rules that all the three accused persons have a case to answer. 3. Section 210 of the CPC complied with. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT VOI THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026. ………….……………. A. N. ONGERI JUDGE In the presence of: Court Assistant: Millicent/Mabishi ………………………………………….……………. for the Prosecutor https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/2762/eng@2026-03-05 1

page 1 of 2

………………………………………………………… for the Accused https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/2762/eng@2026-03-05 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.