Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Silvester Maritim Kirui & 2 others v Sivester Maritim Kirui & 2 others

In re Estate of the Late Arap Kirui alias Kipbet (Deceased) (Succession Cause 311 of 2007) [2026] KEHC 2424 (KLR) (19 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 2424 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KERICHO SUCCESSION CAUSE 311 OF 2007 JK SERGON, J FEBRUARY 19, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE KIBET ARAP KIRUI ALIAS KIPBET KIRUI (DECEASED) BETWEEN SILVESTER MARITIM KIRUI ....................................................... 1ST PROTESTOR FRANCIS KIPKORIR BETT .......................................................... 2ND PROTESTOR JANE LANGAT ................................................................................. 3RD PROTESTOR AND SIVESTER MARITIM KIRUI ......................................................... 1ST PETITIONER HILLARY KIPKORIR TIROP ....................................................... 2ND PETITIONER EDWIN CHERUIYOT KIRUI ALAIS EDWIN CHERUIYOT CHEPKWONY ................................................................................. 3RD PETITIONER RULING 1. Hillary Korir Tirop, the applicant herein took out the motion dated 28th July, 2025 whereof he sought for an order directing the Officer Commanding Nyagacho Police Station to render security to the Kericho County Surveyor and the Land Registrar, Kericho County while visiting L.R. No. Kericho/ Kichimchim/230 for purposes of demarcation and subdivision in accordance with the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 4/12/2024. 2. The Applicant filed an Affidavit he swore in support of the application. Sylvester Maritim Kirui, the 1st Petitioner filed a Replying Affidavit to oppose the Application 3. It is the averment of the applicant that he has found it impossible to act in compliance with the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued to him as the Land Registrar and Surveyor, Kericho for https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/2424/eng@2026-02-19 1

page 1 of 2

fear of being assaulted and or harmed while performing their lawful duties declined to visit the property unless they are provided with security. 4. The 1st Petitioner averred in the Replying Affidavit that the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant has not been presented to the Kericho County Land Registrar with a view to registering the duly executed succession transmission forms. 5. He further deponed that neither the Land Registrar nor the County Surveyor has informed him of their intention to visit the land. 6. He also averred that Hillary Korir Tirop is unknown to him therefore he is a stranger to him. He claimed that the Applicant is malicious as his intention is aimed at causing tension and disharmony in the deceased’s family. 7. Having considered the rival averments and arguments, it is apparent that the 1st Petitioner has not controverted the Applicant’s assertion that the Land Registrar and the Surveyor have expressed their concerns of being harmed if they visited the estate land L.R. Kericho/Kipchimchim/230 to carry out survey and demarcation work on the Estate land without security. 8. In any case, the 1st Petitioner has not shown the prejudice he would suffer if the Land Surveyor and the Land Registrar are provided with security while on the Estate land to perform their duties of demarcation and subdivision. 9. I am satisfied the application was genuinely made to facilitate the implementation of the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant. 10. Consequently, the Notice of Motion dated 28th July, 2025 is allowed as prayed. This being a family matter, a fair order on costs is that each party should meet their own costs. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT KERICHO THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 …………………………… J.K. SERGON JUDGE In the presence of:C/Assistant - Rutoh No Appearance https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/2424/eng@2026-02-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.