Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rphus Mjomba Mwandembo & 2 others v Directorate of Criminal Investigations & 2 others

Mwandembo & 2 others v Directorate of Criminal Investigations & 2 others (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E027 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 1698 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 1698 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VOI MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E027 OF 2024 AN ONGERI, J FEBRUARY 11, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 2, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 34, 40, 47, 48, 49, 50, 63, 258, 259 AND 260 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF THE LIBERTY, FREEDOM AND SECURITY OF PERSONS BETWEEN RPHUS MJOMBA MWANDEMBO ................................................. 1ST APPLICANT ANNE KALAMBA MWANDEMBO ................................................ 2ND APPLICANT LOICE MKANYIKA MWANDEMBO ............................................. 3RD APPLICANT AND DIRECTORATE OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS .............. 1ST RESPONDENT INSPECTOR GENERAL NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE ....... 2ND RESPONDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS .............................. 3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. Since the parties have settled this matter and upon oral application by Counsel for the Applicants, the application dated 19th December 2024 is marked as withdrawn with no orders as to costs. 2. The file is marked as closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI HIGH COURT. ASENATH ONGERI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1698/eng@2026-02-11 1

page 1 of 2

In the presence of:Court Assistant: Millicent. Prosecutor: Mr. Kazungu. Miss Nekesa holding brief Mr. Omari for the Applicant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1698/eng@2026-02-11 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.