Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Patrick Kariuki Mwangi & 1 other v George Gathuita Mwangi

Mwangi & another v Mwangi; Gathuta & 3 others (Interested Parties) (Miscellaneous Application 127 of 2000) [2026] KEHC 1257 (KLR) (4 February 2026) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 1257 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION 127 OF 2000 JM NANG'EA, J FEBRUARY 4, 2026 BETWEEN PATRICK KARIUKI MWANGI ......................................................... 1ST PLAINTIFF RUTH MUTHONI MWANGI ........................................................... 2ND PLAINTIFF AND GEORGE GATHUITA MWANGI ......................................................... DEFENDANT AND FLORENCE NYAMBURA GATHUTA ................................. INTERESTED PARTY JOSEPH KAMUA MWANGI .................................................. INTERESTED PARTY WILSON KIRERU MWANGI ................................................ INTERESTED PARTY PETER NDIRANGU MWANGI ............................................ INTERESTED PARTY JUDGMENT 1. The Interested Parties bring a Notice of Motion dated 10/3/2025 for orders as here below;a. Spent. b. Spent. c. That this Honourable Court be pleased to review, vary or set aside the status quo order made on the 2nd day of October 2000 and all other consequential orders thereto. d. That the Honourable Court be pleased to order the transfer of the original lower court file Nyahururu Principal Magistrate Succession Cause No. 78 of 1999 itself back to the Principal Magistrates Court at Nyahururu and try and/or dispose of the same. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1257/eng@2026-02-04 1

page 1 of 2

e. That the original lower court file Nyahururu Principal Magistrate Succession Cause No. 78 of 1999 be presented before the Principal Magistrates Court at Nyahururu within fourteen days of the date hereof for the purpose of disposal of the application for by interested parties herein to obtain a grant letter of administration in the succession cause. f. THAT the cost of the application be in the cause. 2. The Applicants swore a joint affidavit in support of the Motion. The Respondent described as “Plaintiff” and a “Defendant” have not replied to the Application despite evidence of service thereof upon them. 3. Status quo order the court made on 2/10/2011 was not defined for better understanding. It is therefore unclear what state of affairs was to be maintained. 4. As there is no objection to the Application, the same is allowed with no order as to costs. The Deputy Registrar is directed to forthwith transmit the file in question to Nyahururu Law Courts as prayed. J. M. NANG’EA - JUDGE JUDGEMENT DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026. In the presence of: Mr. Ng’ang’a Advocate for Mr. Mbiyu Advocate for the Applicant Respondents, Absent J.M. NANG’EA - JUDGE. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1257/eng@2026-02-04 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.