Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Brighton Hosea Enos v Republic

Enos v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E024 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1188 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 1188 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT GARSEN MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E024 OF 2025 JN NJAGI, J FEBRUARY 10, 2026 BETWEEN BRIGHTON HOSEA ENOS .................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant has filed an undated application seeking that the period spent in custody be computed in the sentence meted on him in accordance with the provisions of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code that requires that the court when sentencing an accused person who has been in custody during trial to take into account the period spent in custody. 2. I have called for and perused the original file in Garsen Sexual Ofiences Case No. 12 of 2018 wherein the applicant was tried and convicted for the ofience of incest contrary to Section 20(1) of the Sexual Offences Act and was on 13th March 2019 sentenced to serve 15 years imprisonment. The court record indicates that the Applicant was arraigned in court on 3rd July 2018 and was in custody throughout the trial. The trial court never indicated when sentencing the Applicant that it had taken into account the period of 7 months that he was in custody before he was sentenced. 3. I have also perused the judgment in the Applicant’s appeal to the High Court in Garsen Criminal Appeal No.50 of 2019. The issue of the time spent in custody was not raised and wasn’t considered by the High Court. 4. In view of the provision of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I find the application herein to be merited as the time spent in custody was not taken into account by the trial court when the Applicant was sentenced. The provisions of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code are mandatory. I therefore order that the sentence meted on the Applicant in Garsen Sexual Ofices Case https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1188/eng@2026-02-10 1

page 1 of 2

No. 12 of 2018 commences from the time the Applicant, Brighton Hosea Enos, was arraigned in court, that is on 3rd July 2018. It is so ordered. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT GARSEN THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026. J. N. NJAGI JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Oluoch for Respondent Applicant present virtually at GK prison Manyani Court Assistant - Jumaa https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1188/eng@2026-02-10 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.