Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Mutua Nthuku v Republic

Nthuku v Republic (Criminal Appeal E025 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1030 (KLR) (5 February 2026) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 1030 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MACHAKOS CRIMINAL APPEAL E025 OF 2025 NIO ADAGI, J FEBRUARY 5, 2026 BETWEEN JOHN MUTUA NTHUKU ..................................................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (Being an appeal against the Sentence by Hon. V. Ochanda (SRM) in the Machakos Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. E254 of 2024 dated 3rd September 2024) JUDGMENT 1. The Appellant lodged this appeal vide the petition of Appeal which is undated. The matter came up for mention for directions severally and on 20/1/2026 this court sought for time to peruse the file since the Appeal is only on sentence. 2. On 4/2/2026 the matter came up for mention for directions but unfortunately the court had not perused the lower court file record. 3. This court has now had the chance to peruse through the lower court file record and has established that the Appellant was charged with the ofience of Burglary contrary to Section 304(2) and Stealing contrary to Section 279 (b) of the Penal Code. 4. The charge sheet as drawn compressed the ofiences of Burglary and Stealing into a single charge/count. 5. The record shows that the Appellant pleaded to one charge but the court proceeded to sentence the accused to serve five (5) years on each limbo of the ofience. 6. The record further shows the Appellant pleaded guilty but before that, the court did not explain to him the consequences of pleading guilty and the nature of sentence that was likely to be imposed against him. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1030/eng@2026-02-05 1

page 1 of 2

7. I find that the manner in which the plea was taken infringed on the Appellant’s right to a fair trial under Article 50(2) of the Constitution. The same was equivocal. I further find that the sentence was therefore erroneously imposed on the Appellant. 8. Accordingly, I allow the appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence. 9. The appellant is forthwith directed to be released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held. This file is closed. JUDGEMENT WRITTEN, DATED & SIGNED AT MACHAKOS THIS 5TH FEBRUARY, 2026 NOEL I. ADAGI JUDGE DELIVERED VIRTUALLY ON TEAMS AT MACHAKOS THIS 5TH FEBRUARY, 2026 In the presence of: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/1030/eng@2026-02-05 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.